[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <mhng-199961ff-1c6e-41f4-b7e4-66c1bbba15e3@palmer-si-x1c4>
Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2019 14:46:52 -0800 (PST)
From: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...ive.com>
To: robh@...nel.org
CC: Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
mark.rutland@....com, aou@...s.berkeley.edu,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, paul@...an.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/7] dt-bindings: riscv: cpus: add E51 cores to the list of documented CPUs
On Thu, 20 Dec 2018 13:01:41 PST (-0800), robh@...nel.org wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 09:21:50PM -0800, Paul Walmsley wrote:
>> Add compatible strings for the SiFive E51 family of CPU cores to the
>> RISC-V CPU compatible string documentation. The E51 CPU core is
>> described in:
>>
>> https://static.dev.sifive.com/FU540-C000-v1.0.pdf
>>
>> Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
>> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
>> Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...ive.com>
>> Cc: Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>
>> Cc: devicetree@...r.kernel.org
>> Cc: linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org
>> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
>> Signed-off-by: Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Paul Walmsley <paul@...an.com>
>> ---
>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/cpus.txt | 5 +++--
>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/cpus.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/cpus.txt
>> index adf7b7af5dc3..fb9d4f86f41f 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/cpus.txt
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/cpus.txt
>> @@ -68,8 +68,9 @@ described below.
>> - compatible:
>> Usage: required
>> Value type: <stringlist>
>> - Definition: must contain "riscv", may contain one of
>> - "sifive,rocket0"
>> + Definition: must contain "riscv", may contain one or
>> + more of "sifive,rocket0", "sifive,e51",
>> + "sifive,e5"
>
> I can't really tell what are valid combinations from this. It reads that
> I could list every string here and that would be valid. It is basically
> 'riscv' plus any other combinations of strings.
I think that's actually the correct interpretation: if it's a RISC-V CPU then
it must have "riscv" listed in compatible, but it can also be anything else.
There's some concrete examples here (a "sifive,e51" is a type of "riscv"), but
I don't think it's realistic to count on us being able to enumerate all RISC-V
implementations here.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists