lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 4 Jan 2019 11:03:09 +0530
From:   Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@...eaurora.org>
To:     Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc:     Andy Gross <andy.gross@...aro.org>,
        Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
        Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
        David Collins <collinsd@...eaurora.org>,
        Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 01/10] dt-bindings: opp: Introduce qcom-opp bindings



On 1/4/2019 12:13 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 21, 2018 at 2:56 AM Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@...eaurora.org> wrote:
>>
>> On Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. platforms, an OPP node needs
>> to describe an additional level/corner value that is then communicated
>> to a remote microprocessor by the CPU, which then takes some
>> actions (like adjusting voltage values across various rails)
>> based on the value passed.
>>
>> Describe these bindings in the qcom-opp bindings document.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@...eaurora.org>
>> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
>> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>
>> Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
> 
> And rescinded...
> 
> [...]
> 
>> +Required properties:
>> +- qcom,level: On Qualcomm platforms an OPP node can describe a positive value
>> +representing a corner/level that's communicated with a remote microprocessor
>> +(usually called the RPM) which then translates it into a certain voltage on
>> +a voltage rail.
> 
> Now we have Mediatek adding mtk,level...[1]
> 
> Create something common. Just 'opp-level' perhaps.

Sure Rob, I will resubmit with something more generic so it can
be used across SoC vendors.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ