lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8cdbcb63-d2f7-cace-0eda-d73255fd47e7@i-love.sakura.ne.jp>
Date:   Sat, 5 Jan 2019 19:49:11 +0900
From:   Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp>
To:     Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>
Cc:     syzbot <syzbot+ea7d9cb314b4ab49a18a@...kaller.appspotmail.com>,
        David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@....inr.ac.ru>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        syzkaller-bugs <syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com>,
        Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>,
        Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Subject: Re: INFO: rcu detected stall in ndisc_alloc_skb

On 2019/01/03 2:06, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> On 2018/12/31 17:24, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
>>>> Since this involves OOMs and looks like a one-off induced memory corruption:
>>>>
>>>> #syz dup: kernel panic: corrupted stack end in wb_workfn
>>>>
>>>
>>> Why?
>>>
>>> RCU stall in this case is likely to be latency caused by flooding of printk().
>>
>> Just a hypothesis. OOMs lead to arbitrary memory corruptions, so can
>> cause stalls as well. But can be what you said too. I just thought
>> that cleaner dashboard is more useful than a large assorted pile of
>> crashes. If you think it's actionable in some way, feel free to undup.
>>
> 
> We don't know why bpf tree is hitting this problem.
> Let's continue monitoring this problem.
> 
> #syz undup
> 

A report at 2019/01/05 10:08 from "no output from test machine (2)"
( https://syzkaller.appspot.com/text?tag=CrashLog&x=1700726f400000 )
says that there are flood of memory allocation failure messages.
Since continuous memory allocation failure messages itself is not
recognized as a crash, we might be misunderstanding that this problem
is not occurring recently. It will be nice if we can run testcases
which are executed on bpf-next tree.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ