lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190105125115.GA2647@basecamp>
Date:   Sat, 5 Jan 2019 07:51:15 -0500
From:   Brian Masney <masneyb@...tation.org>
To:     Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
Cc:     andy.gross@...aro.org, bjorn.andersson@...aro.org,
        linus.walleij@...aro.org, marc.zyngier@....com,
        shawnguo@...nel.org, dianders@...omium.org,
        linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, nicolas.dechesne@...aro.org,
        niklas.cassel@...aro.org, david.brown@...aro.org,
        robh+dt@...nel.org, mark.rutland@....com, thierry.reding@...il.com,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] qcom: spmi-gpio: add support for hierarchical IRQ
 chip

On Sat, Jan 05, 2019 at 07:08:44AM -0500, Brian Masney wrote:
> > I also seem to recall that GPIO numbering starts from 1 instead of
> > 0, so please keep that in mind.
> 
> I'm using the pinctrl numbering, which is zero based.
> 
> / # head /sys/kernel/debug/pinctrl/fc4cf000.spmi\:pm8941@0\:gpios@...0/pins 
> registered pins: 36
> pin 0 (gpio1) 
> pin 1 (gpio2) 
> pin 2 (gpio3) 
> pin 3 (gpio4) 
> pin 4 (gpio5) 
> pin 5 (gpio6) 
> pin 6 (gpio7) 
> pin 7 (gpio8) 
> pin 8 (gpio9) 

After more thought: the pin numbering from pinctrl is an implementation
detail that device tree should not be aware of. This needs to be the
GPIO pin number. I'll correct this in v2.

Brian

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ