[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <nycvar.YSQ.7.76.1901051112560.1783@knanqh.ubzr>
Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2019 11:13:30 -0500 (EST)
From: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@...aro.org>
To: Stefan Agner <stefan@...er.ch>
cc: linux@...linux.org.uk, ndesaulniers@...gle.com,
natechancellor@...il.com, arnd@...db.de, ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org,
peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...hat.com, will.deacon@....com,
julien.thierry@....com, mark.rutland@....com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] ARM: spinlock: use unified assembler language
syntax
On Thu, 3 Jan 2019, Stefan Agner wrote:
> Convert the conditional infix to a postfix to make sure this inline
> assembly is unified syntax. Since gcc assumes non-unified syntax
> when emitting ARM instructions, make sure to define the syntax as
> unified.
>
> This allows to use LLVM's integrated assembler.
Same comment as for patch 2/3.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Agner <stefan@...er.ch>
> ---
> Changes since v1:
> - Explicitly use unified syntax for inline assembly
>
>
> arch/arm/include/asm/spinlock.h | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/spinlock.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/spinlock.h
> index 099c78fcf62d..8f009e788ad4 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/spinlock.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/spinlock.h
> @@ -210,11 +210,12 @@ static inline void arch_read_lock(arch_rwlock_t *rw)
>
> prefetchw(&rw->lock);
> __asm__ __volatile__(
> +" .syntax unified\n"
> "1: ldrex %0, [%2]\n"
> " adds %0, %0, #1\n"
> " strexpl %1, %0, [%2]\n"
> WFE("mi")
> -" rsbpls %0, %1, #0\n"
> +" rsbspl %0, %1, #0\n"
> " bmi 1b"
> : "=&r" (tmp), "=&r" (tmp2)
> : "r" (&rw->lock)
> --
> 2.20.1
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists