lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1546721566.29843.0@crapouillou.net>
Date:   Sat, 05 Jan 2019 17:52:46 -0300
From:   Paul Cercueil <paul@...pouillou.net>
To:     Uwe Kleine-König 
        <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
Cc:     Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
        Paul Burton <paul.burton@...s.com>,
        James Hogan <jhogan@...nel.org>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org, linux-mips@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 13/27] pwm: jz4740: Use clocks from TCU driver

Hi,

On Sat, Jan 5, 2019 at 4:45 PM, Uwe Kleine-König 
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de> wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> On Thu, Dec 27, 2018 at 07:13:05PM +0100, Paul Cercueil wrote:
>>  diff --git a/drivers/pwm/Kconfig b/drivers/pwm/Kconfig
>>  index 4ed003bc3d8d..0343f0c1238e 100644
>>  --- a/drivers/pwm/Kconfig
>>  +++ b/drivers/pwm/Kconfig
>>  @@ -202,7 +202,8 @@ config PWM_IMX
>>   config PWM_JZ4740
>>   	tristate "Ingenic JZ47xx PWM support"
>>   	depends on MACH_INGENIC
>>  -	select REGMAP
>>  +	depends on COMMON_CLK
>>  +	select INGENIC_TIMER
> 
> Did you drop REGMAP on purpose?

INGENIC_TIMER selects it, so it's still a dependency but indirectly.
Should I restore it?

> Best regards
> Uwe
> 
> --
> Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-König        
>     |
> Industrial Linux Solutions                 | 
> http://www.pengutronix.de/  |

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ