[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190104172802.ce9c4b77577a9c2810f04171@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2019 17:28:02 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
Cc: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
syzbot <syzbot+b19c2dc2c990ea657a71@...kaller.appspotmail.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>, linux@...inikbrodowski.net,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
syzkaller-bugs <syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com>,
xieyisheng1@...wei.com, zhong jiang <zhongjiang@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: KMSAN: uninit-value in mpol_rebind_mm
On Fri, 4 Jan 2019 09:50:31 +0100 Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz> wrote:
> > Yes, it doesn't and it's not trivial to do. The tool reports uses of
> > unint _values_. Values don't necessary reside in memory. It can be a
> > register, that come from another register that was calculated as a sum
> > of two other values, which may come from a function argument, etc.
>
> I see. BTW, the patch I sent will be picked up for testing, or does it
> have to be in mmotm/linux-next first?
I grabbed it. To go further we'd need a changelog, a signoff,
description of testing status, reviews, a Fixes: and perhaps a
cc:stable ;)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists