[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190105032817.13994-1-axel.lin@ingics.com>
Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2019 11:28:17 +0800
From: Axel Lin <axel.lin@...ics.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: Matt Porter <mporter@...aro.org>,
Tim Kryger <tim.kryger@...aro.org>,
Markus Mayer <markus.mayer@...aro.org>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Axel Lin <axel.lin@...ics.com>
Subject: [RFT][PATCH] regulator: bcm590xx: Fix .enable_reg for BCM590XX_REG_VSR
Current implementation missed the case BCM590XX_REG_VSR, so
bcm590xx_get_enable_register() returns 0 when id is BCM590XX_REG_VSR.
Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@...ics.com>
---
Hi Matt,
Current code looks strange becasue bcm590xx_get_enable_register() returns 0
for BCM590XX_REG_VSR but there is a BCM590XX_VSRPMCTRL1 defined in the code.
I don't have the h/w, and I even cannot find the datasheet on the internet.
I might be wrong, but just in case this might fix a real bug.
Please help to review and test this patch.
Thanks,
Axel
drivers/regulator/bcm590xx-regulator.c | 4 ++++
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/regulator/bcm590xx-regulator.c b/drivers/regulator/bcm590xx-regulator.c
index 92d6d7b10cf7..e49c0a7d5dd5 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/bcm590xx-regulator.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/bcm590xx-regulator.c
@@ -242,8 +242,12 @@ static int bcm590xx_get_enable_register(int id)
case BCM590XX_REG_SDSR2:
reg = BCM590XX_SDSR2PMCTRL1;
break;
+ case BCM590XX_REG_VSR:
+ reg = BCM590XX_VSRPMCTRL1;
+ break;
case BCM590XX_REG_VBUS:
reg = BCM590XX_OTG_CTRL;
+ break;
}
--
2.17.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists