[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2ca83c9db45b19df105d9613cdc40ab4@memeware.net>
Date: Sun, 06 Jan 2019 08:58:53 +0000
From: vnsndalce@...eware.net
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, gentoo-user@...ts.gentoo.org,
freebsd-chat@...ebsd.org, misc@...nbsd.org
Subject: Threats of "blackballing" from industry if copyright-holders rescind.
> lol, you people are idiots. In a time where you can and will be fired
> and ruined for ticking the wrong box, rescinding your code from a
> project such as the linux kernel will just blackball you from the
> entire industry forever. For good reason too. I wouldn't play with
> someone who takes the ball home when he gets mad either.
Why to think like a wageslave.
The old-school linux contributors did not do it for money, and their
copyrights (obviously) are still good.
Why would you give a shit if you were blacklisted from "the industry",
you have a cause of action in your hands. Legal action can reap you
dividends that you would never otherwise achieve through your entire
life.
A cause of action is worth 100 or 1000 of your earning years, often.
> lol, you people are idiots. In a time where you can and will be fired
> and ruined for ticking the wrong box, rescinding your code from a
> project such as the linux kernel will just blackball you from the
> entire industry forever. For good reason too. I wouldn't play with
> someone who takes the ball home when he gets mad either.
If bloc-recissions and litigation happen, you may not have an industry
to blackball them from.
And you can't "just reimplement" the removed code and functionality
either: as that may be infringing on the previous work as-well :). More
litigation follows to determine that.
-------
Explanation in plain American:
Video: https://openload.co/f/mT_AH3xmIUM/TruthAboutLinuxandGPLv2__.mp4
Audio: https://ufile.io/sdhpl
Powered by blists - more mailing lists