[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1546878450-20341-6-git-send-email-andrew.murray@arm.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2019 16:27:22 +0000
From: Andrew Murray <andrew.murray@....com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Richard Henderson <rth@...ddle.net>,
Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@...assic.park.msu.ru>,
Matt Turner <mattst88@...il.com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>, suzuki.poulose@....com,
robin.murphy@....com, Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
Cc: x86@...nel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-alpha@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v4 05/13] arm: perf: conditionally use PERF_PMU_CAP_NO_EXCLUDE
The ARM PMU driver can be used to represent a variety of ARM based
PMUs. Some of these PMUs do not provide support for context
exclusion, where this is the case we advertise the
PERF_PMU_CAP_NO_EXCLUDE capability to ensure that perf prevents us
from handling events where any exclusion flags are set.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Murray <andrew.murray@....com>
Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
---
drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c | 15 +++++----------
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c b/drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c
index d0b7dd8..eec75b9 100644
--- a/drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c
+++ b/drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c
@@ -357,13 +357,6 @@ static irqreturn_t armpmu_dispatch_irq(int irq, void *dev)
}
static int
-event_requires_mode_exclusion(struct perf_event_attr *attr)
-{
- return attr->exclude_idle || attr->exclude_user ||
- attr->exclude_kernel || attr->exclude_hv;
-}
-
-static int
__hw_perf_event_init(struct perf_event *event)
{
struct arm_pmu *armpmu = to_arm_pmu(event->pmu);
@@ -393,9 +386,8 @@ __hw_perf_event_init(struct perf_event *event)
/*
* Check whether we need to exclude the counter from certain modes.
*/
- if ((!armpmu->set_event_filter ||
- armpmu->set_event_filter(hwc, &event->attr)) &&
- event_requires_mode_exclusion(&event->attr)) {
+ if (armpmu->set_event_filter &&
+ armpmu->set_event_filter(hwc, &event->attr)) {
pr_debug("ARM performance counters do not support "
"mode exclusion\n");
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
@@ -867,6 +859,9 @@ int armpmu_register(struct arm_pmu *pmu)
if (ret)
return ret;
+ if (!pmu->set_event_filter)
+ pmu->pmu.capabilities |= PERF_PMU_CAP_NO_EXCLUDE;
+
ret = perf_pmu_register(&pmu->pmu, pmu->name, -1);
if (ret)
goto out_destroy;
--
2.7.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists