linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 11/15] KVM: s390: restore IAM in get

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <d1046c6b-5013-e79e-7af9-ad8c11903af4@linux.ibm.com>
Date:   Mon, 7 Jan 2019 19:17:15 +0100
From:   Michael Mueller <mimu@...ux.ibm.com>
To:     pmorel@...ux.ibm.com, KVM Mailing List <kvm@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:     Linux-S390 Mailing List <linux-s390@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        kvm390-list@...maker.boeblingen.de.ibm.com,
        Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
        Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
        Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
        Janosch Frank <frankja@...ux.ibm.com>,
        David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
        Cornelia Huck <cohuck@...hat.com>,
        Halil Pasic <pasic@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 11/15] KVM: s390: restore IAM in get_ipm() when IPM is
 clean



On 03.01.19 16:06, Pierre Morel wrote:
> On 19/12/2018 20:17, Michael Mueller wrote:
>> The patch adds the parameter irq_flags and allows to
>> restore the Interruption Alert Mask (IAM) in the GISA
>> atomically while guaranteeing the IPM is clean.
>>
>> The function returns the IPM of the GISA. If the returned
>> value is 0x00 and the IRQ_FLAG_IAM was set, the IAM has
>> been restored.
>>
>> New irq flag:
>>    IRQ_FLAG_IAM: When set, the IAM is restored if no ISC bit
>>            is set in the IPM, i.e. no new airqs are
>>         pending. The test and restore operations
>>         are done atomically.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Michael Mueller <mimu@...ux.ibm.com>
>> ---
>>   arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>>   1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c b/arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c
>> index 1cc3ad2e6c7e..8307717e3caf 100644
>> --- a/arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c
>> +++ b/arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c
>> @@ -37,6 +37,7 @@
>>   #define IRQ_FLAG_LOCAL    0x8000 /* include local interruption 
>> pending mask */
>>   #define IRQ_FLAG_FLOATING 0x4000 /* include float interruption 
>> pending mask */
>>   #define IRQ_FLAG_GISA     0x2000 /* include GISA interruption 
>> pending mask */
>> +#define IRQ_FLAG_IAM      0x0080 /* when set try to restore IAM */
>>   #define IRQ_MASK_ALL      (IRQ_FLAG_LOCAL | IRQ_FLAG_FLOATING | 
>> IRQ_FLAG_GISA)
>>   #define IRQ_MASK_NO_GISA  (IRQ_MASK_ALL & ~IRQ_FLAG_GISA)
>> @@ -253,9 +254,32 @@ static inline void set_ipm_gisc(struct 
>> kvm_s390_gisa *gisa, u32 gisc)
>>       set_bit_inv(IPM_BIT_OFFSET + gisc, (unsigned long *) gisa);
>>   }
>> -static inline u8 get_ipm(struct kvm_s390_gisa *gisa)
>> +static inline u8 get_ipm(struct kvm_s390_gisa *gisa, u16 irq_flags)
>>   {
>> -    return READ_ONCE(gisa->ipm);
>> +    u64 word, _word;
>> +    u8 ipm;
>> +
>> +    if (!(irq_flags & IRQ_FLAG_IAM))
>> +        return READ_ONCE(gisa->ipm);
>> +
>> +    do {
>> +        word = READ_ONCE(gisa->u64.word[0]);
>> +        ipm = word >> 24;
>> +        /* If the GISA is in the alert list, return the IPM. */
>> +        if ((u64)gisa != word >> 32)
>> +            return ipm;
>> +        /* If the IPM is dirty, return the IPM. */
>> +        if (ipm)
>> +            return ipm;
>> +        /*
>> +         * Try to restore the IAM or loop, if the IPM is dirty
>> +         * again or the GISA has been inserted into the alert list.
>> +         */
>> +        _word = (word & ~0xffUL) |
>> +            container_of(gisa, struct sie_page2, gisa)->kvm->arch.iam;
>> +    } while (cmpxchg(&gisa->u64.word[0], word, _word) != _word);
>> +
>> +    return 0;
>>   }
> 
> Personal opinion, but this function do more than just getting the IPM, 
> shouldn't it be reflected in the function name?

The main task of this function is to fetch the IPM. The additional
functionality is expressed in the flags.

A call like get_ipm_try_iam_restore(kvm, 0) would be more confusing.

> 
>>   static inline void clear_ipm_gisc(struct kvm_s390_gisa *gisa, u32 gisc)
>> @@ -277,7 +301,7 @@ static inline unsigned long pending_irqs(struct 
>> kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u16 irq_flags)
>>       if (irq_flags & IRQ_FLAG_FLOATING)
>>           pending_irqs |= vcpu->kvm->arch.float_int.pending_irqs;
>>       if (irq_flags & IRQ_FLAG_GISA)
>> -        pending_irqs |= get_ipm(vcpu->kvm->arch.gisa) <<
>> +        pending_irqs |= get_ipm(vcpu->kvm->arch.gisa, irq_flags) <<
>>               IRQ_PEND_IO_ISC_7;
>>       return pending_irqs;
>>   }
>> @@ -1574,7 +1598,7 @@ static int get_top_gisa_isc(struct kvm *kvm, u64 
>> isc_mask, u32 schid)
>>       if (!kvm->arch.gisa)
>>           goto out;
>> -    active_mask = (isc_mask & get_ipm(kvm->arch.gisa) << 24) << 32;
>> +    active_mask = (isc_mask & get_ipm(kvm->arch.gisa, IRQ_FLAG_IAM) 
>> << 24) << 32;
> 
> why do we need to set the IAM here?

Yes, it should not be required, only when a vcpu goes into wait state.

> 
>>       while (active_mask) {
>>           isc = __fls(active_mask) ^ (BITS_PER_LONG - 1);
>>           if (tac_ipm_gisc(kvm->arch.gisa, isc))
>> @@ -2060,7 +2084,7 @@ static int get_all_floating_irqs(struct kvm 
>> *kvm, u8 __user *usrbuf, u64 len)
>>       max_irqs = len / sizeof(struct kvm_s390_irq);
>>       if (kvm->arch.gisa &&
>> -        get_ipm(kvm->arch.gisa)) {
>> +        get_ipm(kvm->arch.gisa, IRQ_FLAG_IAM)) {
> 
> and here?

Yes, it should not be required, only when a vcpu goes into wait state.

> 
>>           for (i = 0; i <= MAX_ISC; i++) {
>>               if (n == max_irqs) {
>>                   /* signal userspace to try again */
>>
> 
>