| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20190107183431.GA12428@embeddedor>
Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2019 12:34:31 -0600
From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
To: Eddie James <eajames@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.com>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc: linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
Subject: [PATCH] hwmon (occ): Fix potential integer overflow
Cast get_unaligned_be32(...) to u64 in order to give the compiler
complete information about the proper arithmetic to use and avoid
a potential integer overflow.
Notice that such function call is used in contexts that expect
expressions of type u64 (64 bits, unsigned); and the following
expressions are currently being evaluated using 32-bit
arithmetic:
val = get_unaligned_be32(&power->update_tag) *
occ->powr_sample_time_us;
val = get_unaligned_be32(&power->vdn.update_tag) *
occ->powr_sample_time_us;
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1442357 ("Unintentional integer overflow")
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1442476 ("Unintentional integer overflow")
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1442508 ("Unintentional integer overflow")
Fixes: ff692d80b2e2 ("hwmon (occ): Add sensor types and versions")
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
---
drivers/hwmon/occ/common.c | 24 ++++++++++++------------
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/occ/common.c b/drivers/hwmon/occ/common.c
index 423903f87955..391118c8aae8 100644
--- a/drivers/hwmon/occ/common.c
+++ b/drivers/hwmon/occ/common.c
@@ -380,8 +380,8 @@ static ssize_t occ_show_power_1(struct device *dev,
val *= 1000000ULL;
break;
case 2:
- val = get_unaligned_be32(&power->update_tag) *
- occ->powr_sample_time_us;
+ val = (u64)get_unaligned_be32(&power->update_tag) *
+ occ->powr_sample_time_us;
break;
case 3:
val = get_unaligned_be16(&power->value) * 1000000ULL;
@@ -425,8 +425,8 @@ static ssize_t occ_show_power_2(struct device *dev,
&power->update_tag);
break;
case 2:
- val = get_unaligned_be32(&power->update_tag) *
- occ->powr_sample_time_us;
+ val = (u64)get_unaligned_be32(&power->update_tag) *
+ occ->powr_sample_time_us;
break;
case 3:
val = get_unaligned_be16(&power->value) * 1000000ULL;
@@ -463,8 +463,8 @@ static ssize_t occ_show_power_a0(struct device *dev,
&power->system.update_tag);
break;
case 2:
- val = get_unaligned_be32(&power->system.update_tag) *
- occ->powr_sample_time_us;
+ val = (u64)get_unaligned_be32(&power->system.update_tag) *
+ occ->powr_sample_time_us;
break;
case 3:
val = get_unaligned_be16(&power->system.value) * 1000000ULL;
@@ -477,8 +477,8 @@ static ssize_t occ_show_power_a0(struct device *dev,
&power->proc.update_tag);
break;
case 6:
- val = get_unaligned_be32(&power->proc.update_tag) *
- occ->powr_sample_time_us;
+ val = (u64)get_unaligned_be32(&power->proc.update_tag) *
+ occ->powr_sample_time_us;
break;
case 7:
val = get_unaligned_be16(&power->proc.value) * 1000000ULL;
@@ -491,8 +491,8 @@ static ssize_t occ_show_power_a0(struct device *dev,
&power->vdd.update_tag);
break;
case 10:
- val = get_unaligned_be32(&power->vdd.update_tag) *
- occ->powr_sample_time_us;
+ val = (u64)get_unaligned_be32(&power->vdd.update_tag) *
+ occ->powr_sample_time_us;
break;
case 11:
val = get_unaligned_be16(&power->vdd.value) * 1000000ULL;
@@ -505,8 +505,8 @@ static ssize_t occ_show_power_a0(struct device *dev,
&power->vdn.update_tag);
break;
case 14:
- val = get_unaligned_be32(&power->vdn.update_tag) *
- occ->powr_sample_time_us;
+ val = (u64)get_unaligned_be32(&power->vdn.update_tag) *
+ occ->powr_sample_time_us;
break;
case 15:
val = get_unaligned_be16(&power->vdn.value) * 1000000ULL;
--
2.20.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists