[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1546900465-5121-1-git-send-email-kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2019 14:34:22 -0800
From: kan.liang@...ux.intel.com
To: x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
bp@...en8.de, peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...hat.com
Cc: ak@...ux.intel.com, eranian@...gle.com,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH V5 1/4] x86/cpufeature: Add facility to check for min microcode revisions
From: Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>
For bug workarounds or checks it is useful to check for specific
microcode revisions.
Add a new generic function to match the CPU with stepping.
Add the other function to check the min microcode revisions for
the matched CPU.
A new table format is introduced to facilitate the quirk to
fill the related information.
This does not change the existing x86_cpu_id because it's an ABI
shared with modules, and also has quite different requirements,
as in no wildcards, but everything has to be matched exactly.
Suggested-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Based-on-code-from: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>
---
Changes since V4:
- Rename to x86_cpu_check and INTEL_CHECK_UCODE
- Split x86_min_microcode() into two functions. One is a generic
CPU match function with stepping. The other is to check the min
microcode revisions.
The previous discussion can be found here.
https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/10/10/740
arch/x86/include/asm/cpu_device_id.h | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/match.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 59 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/cpu_device_id.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/cpu_device_id.h
index baeba05..43f19af 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/cpu_device_id.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/cpu_device_id.h
@@ -11,4 +11,32 @@
extern const struct x86_cpu_id *x86_match_cpu(const struct x86_cpu_id *match);
+/*
+ * Match specific microcode revisions.
+ *
+ * vendor/family/model/stepping must be all set.
+ *
+ * only checks against the boot cpu. When mixed-stepping configs are
+ * valid for a CPU model, add a quirk for every valid stepping and
+ * do the fine-tuning in the quirk handler.
+ */
+
+struct x86_cpu_check {
+ u8 vendor;
+ u8 family;
+ u8 model;
+ u8 stepping;
+ u32 microcode_rev;
+};
+
+#define INTEL_CHECK_UCODE(mod, step, rev) { \
+ .vendor = X86_VENDOR_INTEL, \
+ .family = 6, \
+ .model = mod, \
+ .stepping = step, \
+ .microcode_rev = rev, \
+}
+
+extern bool x86_cpu_has_min_microcode_rev(const struct x86_cpu_check *table);
+
#endif
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/match.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/match.c
index 3fed388..408bed37 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/match.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/match.c
@@ -48,3 +48,34 @@ const struct x86_cpu_id *x86_match_cpu(const struct x86_cpu_id *match)
return NULL;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(x86_match_cpu);
+
+static const struct x86_cpu_check *
+x86_match_cpu_with_stepping(const struct x86_cpu_check *match)
+{
+ struct cpuinfo_x86 *c = &boot_cpu_data;
+ const struct x86_cpu_check *m;
+
+ for (m = match; m->family | m->model; m++) {
+ if (c->x86_vendor != m->vendor)
+ continue;
+ if (c->x86 != m->family)
+ continue;
+ if (c->x86_model != m->model)
+ continue;
+ if (c->x86_stepping != m->stepping)
+ continue;
+ return m;
+ }
+ return NULL;
+}
+
+bool x86_cpu_has_min_microcode_rev(const struct x86_cpu_check *table)
+{
+ const struct x86_cpu_check *res = x86_match_cpu_with_stepping(table);
+
+ if (!res || res->microcode_rev > boot_cpu_data.microcode)
+ return false;
+
+ return true;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(x86_cpu_has_min_microcode_rev);
--
2.7.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists