[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <154690510733.15366.11047294617451125580@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com>
Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2019 15:51:47 -0800
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
To: Brian Masney <masneyb@...tation.org>, andy.gross@...aro.org,
bjorn.andersson@...aro.org, lee.jones@...aro.org,
linus.walleij@...aro.org
Cc: marc.zyngier@....com, shawnguo@...nel.org, dianders@...omium.org,
linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, nicolas.dechesne@...aro.org,
niklas.cassel@...aro.org, david.brown@...aro.org,
robh+dt@...nel.org, mark.rutland@....com, thierry.reding@...il.com,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] ARM: dts: qcom: msm8974: add interrupt controller properties
Quoting Brian Masney (2019-01-06 18:11:45)
> - <0 0xde 0 IRQ_TYPE_NONE>,
> - <0 0xdf 0 IRQ_TYPE_NONE>,
> - <0 0xe0 0 IRQ_TYPE_NONE>,
> - <0 0xe1 0 IRQ_TYPE_NONE>,
> - <0 0xe2 0 IRQ_TYPE_NONE>,
> - <0 0xe3 0 IRQ_TYPE_NONE>;
> + interrupt-parent = <&spmi_bus>;
If I'm reading of_irq_find_parent() correctly, we don't need to specify
this? It becomes implicit because spmi_bus has the interrupt-cells
property and this is a child node of that.
> + interrupt-controller;
> + #interrupt-cells = <2>;
>
> boost_bypass_n_pin: boost-bypass {
> pins = "gpio21";
Powered by blists - more mailing lists