[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <21a86d5e-ff1c-74ec-c683-cc76a7c6e670@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2019 17:03:55 +0800
From: Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@...il.com>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: jslaby@...e.com, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [BUG] tty: serial: mxs-auart: possible concurrency use-after-free
bugs in mxs_auart_dma_exit_channel()
On 2019/1/7 16:52, Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 07, 2019 at 04:47:43PM +0800, Jia-Ju Bai wrote:
>> The driver functions mxs_auart_settermios(), dma_rx_callback() and dma_tx_callback() can be concurrently executed.
>>
>> In Linux 4.19:
>>
>> mxs_auart_settermios
>> mxs_auart_dma_exit
>> mxs_auart_dma_exit_channel
>> line 918: kfree(s->tx_dma_buf);
>> line 919: kfree(s->rx_dma_buf);
>>
>> dma_rx_callback
>> line 862: tty_insert_flip_string(port, s->rx_dma_buf, count);
>> mxs_auart_dma_prep_rx
>> line 890: sg_init_one(sgl, s->rx_dma_buf, UART_XMIT_SIZE);
>>
>> dma_tx_callback
>> mxs_auart_tx_chars
>> line 590: void *buffer = s->tx_dma_buf;
>> mxs_auart_dma_tx
>> line 566: sg_init_one(sgl, s->tx_dma_buf, size);
>>
>> Thus, possible concurrency use-after-free bugs may occur.
>>
>> These possible bugs are found by a static analysis tool written by myself and my manual code review.
> Care to send a patch to fix up this issue?
I would like to, but I do not know how to fix these bugs properly...
There is no lock and lock-related function call in
drivers/tty/serial/mxs-auart.c.
Thus, we may need to introduce a new lock in this source file.
What is your opinion?
Best wishes,
Jia-Ju Bai
Powered by blists - more mailing lists