linux-kernel - Re: [LKP] [mtd] c4dfa25ab3: kernel_BUG_at

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 7 Jan 2019 11:25:08 +0100
From:   Boris Brezillon <bbrezillon@...nel.org>
To:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:     kernel test robot <rong.a.chen@...el.com>,
        David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
        Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>,
        Rafał Miłecki <rafal@...ecki.pl>,
        Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
        Alban Bedel <albeu@...e.fr>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>,
        Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...tlin.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, lkp@...org
Subject: Re: [LKP] [mtd] c4dfa25ab3: kernel_BUG_at_fs/sysfs/file.c

Hello Linus,

On Wed, 2 Jan 2019 11:53:34 -0800
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:

> Hmm..
> 
> Adding a few more mtd people to the cc.

Sorry for the late reply, I don't have access to my @bootlin.com
address anymore and it took me some time to realize you had replied to
this bug report.

> 
> On Tue, Jan 1, 2019 at 4:57 PM kernel test robot <rong.a.chen@...el.com> wrote:
> >
> > FYI, we noticed the following commit (built with gcc-7):
> >
> > commit: c4dfa25ab307a277eafa7067cd927fbe4d9be4ba ("mtd: add support for reading MTD devices via the nvmem API")
> >
> > [   81.780248] kernel BUG at fs/sysfs/file.c:328!
> > [   81.781914] Call Trace:
> > [   81.781914]  sysfs_create_files+0x60/0x180
> > [   81.781914]  mtd_add_partition_attrs+0x14/0x30
> > [   81.781914]  add_mtd_partitions+0x11f/0x260
> > [   81.781914]  mtd_device_parse_register+0x38d/0x4c0
> > [   81.781914]  ns_init_module+0x1033/0x117d
> > [   81.781914]  do_one_initcall+0x18f/0x39e
> > [   81.781914]  kernel_init_freeable+0x2b4/0x353
> > [   81.781914]  kernel_init+0xa/0x120  
> 
> This actually looks like a very old bug, just exposed by a new error case.
> 
> In particular, the mtd code seems to do this in mtd_add_partition():
> 
>         int ret = 0;
>      ...
>         add_mtd_device(&new->mtd);
> 
>         mtd_add_partition_attrs(new);
> 
>         return ret;
> 
> where 'ret' is actually never set to anything but that initial zero.
> 
> And in fact, it looks like it never was used.
> 
> I _think_ that what's going on is that "add_mtd_device()" historically
> never really failed (although it *can* fail), and then
> mtd_add_partition_attrs() is called on something that doesn't really
> exist.
> 
> It looks like the error handling for the add_mtd_device() case nmever
> actually existed, and now the nvmem patch makes that fail in the
> test-case, and the lack of error handling is exposed.
> 
> There is another call-site of add_mtd_device() (in
> add_mtd_partitions() - same pattern, notice the "s" at the end of the
> function name) that also lacks the error handling.

Yep, I fixed the root cause of the crash here [1] and plan to queue the
patch to the mtd/fixes branch soon.

Regards,

Boris

[1]http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1020008