[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0197c64e-6419-db96-d8a9-d17f446aa9c1@huawei.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2019 10:25:11 +0800
From: Chao Yu <yuchao0@...wei.com>
To: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>,
Sahitya Tummala <stummala@...eaurora.org>
CC: <linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] f2fs: fix sbi->extent_list corruption issue
On 2019/1/5 4:33, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> On 01/04, Sahitya Tummala wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 10:17:20AM +0530, Sahitya Tummala wrote:
>>> When there is a failure in f2fs_fill_super() after/during
>>> the recovery of fsync'd nodes, it frees the current sbi and
>>> retries again. This time the mount is successful, but the files
>>> that got recovered before retry, still holds the extent tree,
>>> whose extent nodes list is corrupted since sbi and sbi->extent_list
>>> is freed up. The list_del corruption issue is observed when the
>>> file system is getting unmounted and when those recoverd files extent
>>> node is being freed up in the below context.
>>>
>>> list_del corruption. prev->next should be fffffff1e1ef5480, but was (null)
>>> <...>
>>> kernel BUG at kernel/msm-4.14/lib/list_debug.c:53!
>>> task: fffffff1f46f2280 task.stack: ffffff8008068000
>>> lr : __list_del_entry_valid+0x94/0xb4
>>> pc : __list_del_entry_valid+0x94/0xb4
>>> <...>
>>> Call trace:
>>> __list_del_entry_valid+0x94/0xb4
>>> __release_extent_node+0xb0/0x114
>>> __free_extent_tree+0x58/0x7c
>>> f2fs_shrink_extent_tree+0xdc/0x3b0
>>> f2fs_leave_shrinker+0x28/0x7c
>>> f2fs_put_super+0xfc/0x1e0
>>> generic_shutdown_super+0x70/0xf4
>>> kill_block_super+0x2c/0x5c
>>> kill_f2fs_super+0x44/0x50
>>> deactivate_locked_super+0x60/0x8c
>>> deactivate_super+0x68/0x74
>>> cleanup_mnt+0x40/0x78
>>> __cleanup_mnt+0x1c/0x28
>>> task_work_run+0x48/0xd0
>>> do_notify_resume+0x678/0xe98
>>> work_pending+0x8/0x14
>>>
>>> Fix this by cleaning up inodes, extent tree and nodes of those
>>> recovered files before freeing up sbi and before next retry.
>>>
>> Hi Jaegeuk, Chao,
>>
>> I have observed another scenario where the similar list corruption issue
>> can happen with sbi->inode_list as well. If recover_fsync_data()
>> fails at some point in write_checkpoint() due to some error and if
>> those recovered inodes are still dirty, then after the mount is
>> successful, this issue is observed when that dirty inode is under
>> writeback.
>
> recover_fsync_data() does iget/iput in pair, and destroy_fsync_dnodes() drops
> its dirty list and call iput(), when there is an error. So, after then, there'd
> be no dirty inodes. If there's no error, checkpoint() flushes quota/dentry pages
> in dirty inodes as well. Can we check where this dirty inode came from?
I guess it comes from:
f2fs_recover_fsync_data()
/* Needed for iput() to work correctly and not trash data */
sbi->sb->s_flags |= SB_ACTIVE;
iput_final()
if (!drop && (sb->s_flags & SB_ACTIVE)) {
inode_add_lru(inode);
spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
return;
}
So dirty data in those inode can be remained after iput(), then meta/node
can be persisted during next checkpoint, if checkpoint failed due to error,
dirty inode remain in system. IIUC.
>
> Oh, one sceanrio can be an error by f2fs_disable_checkpoint() which will do GC.
>
>>
>> [ 90.400500] list_del corruption. prev->next should be ffffffed1f566208, but was (null)
>> [ 90.675349] Call trace:
>> [ 90.677869] __list_del_entry_valid+0x94/0xb4
>> [ 90.682351] remove_dirty_inode+0xac/0x114
>> [ 90.686563] __f2fs_write_data_pages+0x6a8/0x6c8
>> [ 90.691302] f2fs_write_data_pages+0x40/0x4c
>> [ 90.695695] do_writepages+0x80/0xf0
>> [ 90.699372] __writeback_single_inode+0xdc/0x4ac
>> [ 90.704113] writeback_sb_inodes+0x280/0x440
>> [ 90.708501] wb_writeback+0x1b8/0x3d0
>> [ 90.712267] wb_workfn+0x1a8/0x4d4
>> [ 90.715765] process_one_work+0x1c0/0x3d4
>> [ 90.719883] worker_thread+0x224/0x344
>> [ 90.723739] kthread+0x120/0x130
>> [ 90.727055] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x18
>>
>> I think it is better to cleanup those inodes completely before freeing sbi
>> and before next retry as done in this patch. Would you like to re-consider
>> this patch for this new issue?
>
> The patch was merged in mainline already.
> Could you take a look at this patch?
>
>>>From cb1d20e640402beed300c2bdce79311ee8a781ad Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>
> Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2019 12:29:00 -0800
> Subject: [PATCH] f2fs: sync filesystem after roll-forward recovery
You mean android kernel mainline?
Thanks,
>
> Some works after roll-forward recovery can get an error which will release
> all the data structures. Let's flush them in order to make it clean.
>
> One possible corruption came from:
>
> [ 90.400500] list_del corruption. prev->next should be ffffffed1f566208, but was (null)
> [ 90.675349] Call trace:
> [ 90.677869] __list_del_entry_valid+0x94/0xb4
> [ 90.682351] remove_dirty_inode+0xac/0x114
> [ 90.686563] __f2fs_write_data_pages+0x6a8/0x6c8
> [ 90.691302] f2fs_write_data_pages+0x40/0x4c
> [ 90.695695] do_writepages+0x80/0xf0
> [ 90.699372] __writeback_single_inode+0xdc/0x4ac
> [ 90.704113] writeback_sb_inodes+0x280/0x440
> [ 90.708501] wb_writeback+0x1b8/0x3d0
> [ 90.712267] wb_workfn+0x1a8/0x4d4
> [ 90.715765] process_one_work+0x1c0/0x3d4
> [ 90.719883] worker_thread+0x224/0x344
> [ 90.723739] kthread+0x120/0x130
> [ 90.727055] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x18
>
> Reported-by: Sahitya Tummala <stummala@...eaurora.org>
> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>
> ---
> fs/f2fs/super.c | 8 ++++++--
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/super.c b/fs/f2fs/super.c
> index 547cb7459be7..bb02186293a3 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/super.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/super.c
> @@ -3357,7 +3357,7 @@ static int f2fs_fill_super(struct super_block *sb, void *data, int silent)
> if (test_opt(sbi, DISABLE_CHECKPOINT)) {
> err = f2fs_disable_checkpoint(sbi);
> if (err)
> - goto free_meta;
> + goto sync_free_meta;
> } else if (is_set_ckpt_flags(sbi, CP_DISABLED_FLAG)) {
> f2fs_enable_checkpoint(sbi);
> }
> @@ -3370,7 +3370,7 @@ static int f2fs_fill_super(struct super_block *sb, void *data, int silent)
> /* After POR, we can run background GC thread.*/
> err = f2fs_start_gc_thread(sbi);
> if (err)
> - goto free_meta;
> + goto sync_free_meta;
> }
> kvfree(options);
>
> @@ -3392,6 +3392,10 @@ static int f2fs_fill_super(struct super_block *sb, void *data, int silent)
> f2fs_update_time(sbi, REQ_TIME);
> return 0;
>
> +sync_free_meta:
> + /* safe to flush all the data */
> + sync_filesystem(sbi->sb);
> +
> free_meta:
> /* flush dirty orphan inode objects */
> f2fs_sync_inode_meta(sbi);
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists