[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190107104453.719883595@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2019 13:30:33 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org,
"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: [PATCH 4.19 006/170] ipv4: Fix potential Spectre v1 vulnerability
4.19-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
[ Upstream commit 5648451e30a0d13d11796574919a359025d52cce ]
vr.vifi is indirectly controlled by user-space, hence leading to
a potential exploitation of the Spectre variant 1 vulnerability.
This issue was detected with the help of Smatch:
net/ipv4/ipmr.c:1616 ipmr_ioctl() warn: potential spectre issue 'mrt->vif_table' [r] (local cap)
net/ipv4/ipmr.c:1690 ipmr_compat_ioctl() warn: potential spectre issue 'mrt->vif_table' [r] (local cap)
Fix this by sanitizing vr.vifi before using it to index mrt->vif_table'
Notice that given that speculation windows are large, the policy is
to kill the speculation on the first load and not worry if it can be
completed with a dependent load/store [1].
[1] https://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=152449131114778&w=2
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
net/ipv4/ipmr.c | 4 ++++
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
--- a/net/ipv4/ipmr.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/ipmr.c
@@ -69,6 +69,8 @@
#include <net/nexthop.h>
#include <net/switchdev.h>
+#include <linux/nospec.h>
+
struct ipmr_rule {
struct fib_rule common;
};
@@ -1612,6 +1614,7 @@ int ipmr_ioctl(struct sock *sk, int cmd,
return -EFAULT;
if (vr.vifi >= mrt->maxvif)
return -EINVAL;
+ vr.vifi = array_index_nospec(vr.vifi, mrt->maxvif);
read_lock(&mrt_lock);
vif = &mrt->vif_table[vr.vifi];
if (VIF_EXISTS(mrt, vr.vifi)) {
@@ -1686,6 +1689,7 @@ int ipmr_compat_ioctl(struct sock *sk, u
return -EFAULT;
if (vr.vifi >= mrt->maxvif)
return -EINVAL;
+ vr.vifi = array_index_nospec(vr.vifi, mrt->maxvif);
read_lock(&mrt_lock);
vif = &mrt->vif_table[vr.vifi];
if (VIF_EXISTS(mrt, vr.vifi)) {
Powered by blists - more mailing lists