linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.14 035/101] net/smc: fix TCP fallback socket release

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20190107105334.842604218@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Mon,  7 Jan 2019 13:32:23 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org,
        syzbot+0bf2e01269f1274b4b03@...kaller.appspotmail.com,
        syzbot+e3132895630f957306bc@...kaller.appspotmail.com,
        Myungho Jung <mhjungk@...il.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: [PATCH 4.14 035/101] net/smc: fix TCP fallback socket release

4.14-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Myungho Jung <mhjungk@...il.com>

[ Upstream commit 78abe3d0dfad196959b1246003366e2610775ea6 ]

clcsock can be released while kernel_accept() references it in TCP
listen worker. Also, clcsock needs to wake up before released if TCP
fallback is used and the clcsock is blocked by accept. Add a lock to
safely release clcsock and call kernel_sock_shutdown() to wake up
clcsock from accept in smc_release().

Reported-by: syzbot+0bf2e01269f1274b4b03@...kaller.appspotmail.com
Reported-by: syzbot+e3132895630f957306bc@...kaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: Myungho Jung <mhjungk@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 net/smc/af_smc.c |   14 ++++++++++++--
 net/smc/smc.h    |    4 ++++
 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/net/smc/af_smc.c
+++ b/net/smc/af_smc.c
@@ -133,8 +133,14 @@ static int smc_release(struct socket *so
 		sk->sk_shutdown |= SHUTDOWN_MASK;
 	}
 	if (smc->clcsock) {
+		if (smc->use_fallback && sk->sk_state == SMC_LISTEN) {
+			/* wake up clcsock accept */
+			rc = kernel_sock_shutdown(smc->clcsock, SHUT_RDWR);
+		}
+		mutex_lock(&smc->clcsock_release_lock);
 		sock_release(smc->clcsock);
 		smc->clcsock = NULL;
+		mutex_unlock(&smc->clcsock_release_lock);
 	}
 
 	/* detach socket */
@@ -184,6 +190,7 @@ static struct sock *smc_sock_alloc(struc
 	INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&smc->sock_put_work, smc_close_sock_put_work);
 	sk->sk_prot->hash(sk);
 	sk_refcnt_debug_inc(sk);
+	mutex_init(&smc->clcsock_release_lock);
 
 	return sk;
 }
@@ -577,7 +584,7 @@ static int smc_clcsock_accept(struct smc
 	struct sock *sk = &lsmc->sk;
 	struct socket *new_clcsock;
 	struct sock *new_sk;
-	int rc;
+	int rc = -EINVAL;
 
 	release_sock(&lsmc->sk);
 	new_sk = smc_sock_alloc(sock_net(sk), NULL);
@@ -590,7 +597,10 @@ static int smc_clcsock_accept(struct smc
 	}
 	*new_smc = smc_sk(new_sk);
 
-	rc = kernel_accept(lsmc->clcsock, &new_clcsock, 0);
+	mutex_lock(&lsmc->clcsock_release_lock);
+	if (lsmc->clcsock)
+		rc = kernel_accept(lsmc->clcsock, &new_clcsock, 0);
+	mutex_unlock(&lsmc->clcsock_release_lock);
 	lock_sock(&lsmc->sk);
 	if  (rc < 0) {
 		lsmc->sk.sk_err = -rc;
--- a/net/smc/smc.h
+++ b/net/smc/smc.h
@@ -185,6 +185,10 @@ struct smc_sock {				/* smc sock contain
 						 * started, waiting for unsent
 						 * data to be sent
 						 */
+	struct mutex            clcsock_release_lock;
+						/* protects clcsock of a listen
+						 * socket
+						 * */
 };
 
 static inline struct smc_sock *smc_sk(const struct sock *sk)