[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190107135215.GG14122@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2019 14:52:15 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Qian Cai <cai@....pw>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
linux kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>, gkohli@...eaurora.org
Subject: Re: kernel BUG at kernel/sched/core.c:3490!
On Tue, Jan 01, 2019 at 12:44:35AM -0500, Qian Cai wrote:
> Running some mmap() workloads to put the system on low memory situation with
> swapping and OOM, and then it trigger this BUG(),
>
> void __noreturn do_task_dead(void)
> {
> /* Causes final put_task_struct in finish_task_switch(): */
> set_special_state(TASK_DEAD);
>
> /* Tell freezer to ignore us: */
> current->flags |= PF_NOFREEZE;
>
> __schedule(false);
> BUG();
>
> /* Avoid "noreturn function does return" - but don't continue if BUG()
> is a NOP: */
> for (;;)
> cpu_relax();
> }
This would mean that we somehow loose the TASK_DEAD state before hitting
schedule(), but that is something that should be avoided by
set_special_state(), which is supposed to serialize against concurrent
wake-ups.
Also see commit: b5bf9a90bbeb ("sched/core: Introduce set_special_state()")
How readily does this reproduce?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists