[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKfTPtC1VVqK8Fde=AdRFyd4--09XVoNg8xHUja2siynL_o_3Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2019 15:03:55 +0100
From: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
To: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: "open list:THERMAL" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Thara Gopinath <thara.gopinath@...aro.org>,
Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@...ux.intel.com>,
rodrigo.vivi@...el.com, David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
"Intel graphics driver community testing & development"
<intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5 2/3] drm/i915: Move on the new pm runtime interface
Hi Tvrtko,
On Mon, 31 Dec 2018 at 13:32, Tvrtko Ursulin
<tvrtko.ursulin@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 21/12/2018 13:26, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> > On Fri, 21 Dec 2018 at 12:33, Tvrtko Ursulin
[snip]
> >>
> >> If it is always monotonic, then worst case we report one wrong sample,
> >> which I guess is still not ideal since someone could be querying the PMU
> >> with quite low frequency.
> >>
> >> There are tests which probably can hit this, but to run them
> >> automatically your patches would need to be rebased on drm-tip and maybe
> >> sent to our trybot. I can do that after the holiday break if you are
> >> okay with having the series waiting until then.
> >
> > yes looks good to me
>
> Looks good to me as well. And our CI agrees with it. So:
>
> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@...el.com>
Thanks for the review and the test
>
> I assume you will take the patch through some power related tree and we
> will eventually pull it back to drm-tip.
Rafael,
How do you want to proceed with this patch and the 2 others of the serie ?
Regards,
Vincent
>
> Regards,
>
> Tvrtko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists