linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 1/3] dt-bindings: thermal: Add binding document for SR thermal

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 7 Jan 2019 10:11:21 +0530
From:   Srinath Mannam <srinath.mannam@...adcom.com>
To:     Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc:     Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
        Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
        Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@...il.com>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        BCM Kernel Feedback <bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>,
        Pramod Kumar <pramod.kumar@...adcom.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/3] dt-bindings: thermal: Add binding document for SR thermal

Hi Rob,

Thank you for the note. I will take care from next time onward.

Thanks & Regards,
Srinath.

On Thu, Jan 3, 2019 at 10:31 PM Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu,  3 Jan 2019 14:25:32 +0530, Srinath Mannam wrote:
> > From: Pramod Kumar <pramod.kumar@...adcom.com>
> >
> > Add binding document for supported thermal implementation
> > in Stingray.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Pramod Kumar <pramod.kumar@...adcom.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Srinath Mannam <srinath.mannam@...adcom.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Ray Jui <ray.jui@...adcom.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Scott Branden <scott.branden@...adcom.com>
> > ---
> >  .../bindings/thermal/brcm,sr-thermal.txt           | 105 +++++++++++++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 105 insertions(+)
> >  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/brcm,sr-thermal.txt
> >
>
> Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by tags when posting new versions. However,
> there's no need to repost patches *only* to add the tags. The upstream
> maintainer will do that for acks received on the version they apply.
>
> If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed.