linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/2] x86/mce/amd: apply missing quirks for family 15 models

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 7 Jan 2019 15:13:49 +0000
From:   S@...r.kernel.org
To:     Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, "S, Shirish" <Shirish.S@....com>
CC:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        "maintainer : X86 ARCHITECTURE" <x86@...nel.org>,
        Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
        Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@...el.com>,
        "open list : X86 ARCHITECTURE" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] x86/mce/amd: apply missing quirks for family 15
 models


On 1/7/2019 4:54 PM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 07, 2019 at 10:37:07AM +0000, S, Shirish wrote:
>> This patch series applies to family 15 CPU's of AMD platforms,
>> so as to address a consistent warning of
>>   "[Firmware Bug]: cpu 0, invalid threshold interrupt offset"
>> at every boot and upon completiong of successful S3 cycle,
>> due to a missing quirk, which was not extended to newer models
>> and also not applied in resume path.
>>
>> Shirish S (2):
>>    x86/mce/amd: Extend "Disable error thresholding bank 4" to more models
>>    x86/mce/amd: Ensure quirks are applied in resume path as well
>>
>>   arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/amd.c  | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>   arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/core.c |  2 +-
>>   2 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> -- 
> You sent those once three days ago. Why are you sending them again?
> There's no changelog to explain what the difference is from the last
> submission so what's up?

I found that the get_maintainers.pl did not add anyone but me for the 
cover letter.

Hence i have re-sent the entire series along with cover letter so that the

reviewers would get context.

> Also, I'd suggest you have more patience.

Sure, I will wait, no worries.

Regards,

Shirish S

>   And while you wait, you can
> take a look at
>
> https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/submitting-patches.html
>
> to read up on all the modalities when sending patches.
>
> Thx.
>
-- 
Regards,
Shirish S