[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190108213743.GN5544@atomide.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2019 13:37:43 -0800
From: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
To: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
"open list:THERMAL" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
LAK <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-omap@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Regression in v5.0-rc1 with autosuspend hrtimers
* Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org> [190108 16:42]:
> On Tue, 8 Jan 2019 at 16:53, Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com> wrote:
> > Hmm so could it be that we now rely on timers that that may
> > not be capable of waking up the system from idle states with
> > hrtimer?
>
> With nohz and hrtimer enabled, timer relies on hrtimer to generate
> the tick so you should use the same interrupt.
OK yeah looks like that part is working just fine.
Adding some printks and debugging over ssh, looks like
omap8250_runtime_resume() gets called just fine based on a wakeirq,
but then omap8250_runtime_suspend() runs immediately instead of
waiting for the three second timeout.
Lowering the autosuspend_delay_ms to 2100 ms makes things work again.
Anything higher than 2200 ms seems to somehow time out immediately
now :)
Regards,
Tony
Powered by blists - more mailing lists