[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGXu5j+z_yRPgE0HO=Sjo_VwwDDPJ+VLxbxwKgbb2cUAB5jmwg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2019 15:34:12 -0800
From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
Cc: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>,
linux-nvdimm <linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: nvdimm crash at boot
On Tue, Jan 8, 2019 at 3:28 PM Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com> wrote:
> Ah, thanks for the report! The key difference is that you don't define
> a "label area", so the driver bails out early and never initializes
> the security state.
>
> This should fix it up.
>
> diff --git a/drivers/nvdimm/dimm_devs.c b/drivers/nvdimm/dimm_devs.c
> index 4890310df874..636cdb06ee17 100644
> --- a/drivers/nvdimm/dimm_devs.c
> +++ b/drivers/nvdimm/dimm_devs.c
> @@ -514,7 +514,7 @@ static umode_t nvdimm_visible(struct kobject
> *kobj, struct attribute *a, int n)
>
> if (a != &dev_attr_security.attr)
> return a->mode;
> - if (nvdimm->sec.state < 0)
> + if (!nvdimm->sec.ops || nvdimm->sec.state < 0)
> return 0;
> /* Are there any state mutation ops? */
> if (nvdimm->sec.ops->freeze || nvdimm->sec.ops->disable
Okay, cool. I wasn't sure if that test needed a deeper check. :)
Fixes: 37833fb7989a9 ("acpi/nfit, libnvdimm: Add freeze security
support to Intel nvdimm")
Tested-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Thanks!
--
Kees Cook
Powered by blists - more mailing lists