lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190108071049.GC32048@kroah.com>
Date:   Tue, 8 Jan 2019 08:10:50 +0100
From:   Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Wei Wang <wei.w.wang@...el.com>
Cc:     virtio-dev@...ts.oasis-open.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
        kvm@...r.kernel.org, mst@...hat.com, cohuck@...hat.com,
        borntraeger@...ibm.com, pbonzini@...hat.com, dgilbert@...hat.com,
        pasic@...ux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/3] virtio_balloon: remove the unnecessary
 0-initialization

On Tue, Jan 08, 2019 at 12:50:05PM +0800, Wei Wang wrote:
> We've changed to kzalloc the vb struct, so no need to 0-initialize
> this field one more time.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Wei Wang <wei.w.wang@...el.com>
> Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@...hat.com>
> ---
>  drivers/virtio/virtio_balloon.c | 1 -
>  1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_balloon.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_balloon.c
> index d48c12c..048959a 100644
> --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_balloon.c
> +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_balloon.c
> @@ -925,7 +925,6 @@ static int virtballoon_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev)
>  						  VIRTIO_BALLOON_CMD_ID_STOP);
>  		vb->cmd_id_stop = cpu_to_virtio32(vb->vdev,
>  						  VIRTIO_BALLOON_CMD_ID_STOP);
> -		vb->num_free_page_blocks = 0;
>  		spin_lock_init(&vb->free_page_list_lock);
>  		INIT_LIST_HEAD(&vb->free_page_list);
>  		if (virtio_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_BALLOON_F_PAGE_POISON)) {
> -- 
> 2.7.4
> 

<formletter>

This is not the correct way to submit patches for inclusion in the
stable kernel tree.  Please read:
    https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/stable-kernel-rules.html
for how to do this properly.

</formletter>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ