[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKfTPtDBEmcsLotp-6K1KU1wM9Ba1EpMp3niXScRxYgzjs0nog@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2019 08:59:56 +0100
From: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
To: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
"open list:THERMAL" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
LAK <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-omap@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Regression in v5.0-rc1 with autosuspend hrtimers
Hi Tony,
On Tue, 8 Jan 2019 at 00:38, Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Looks like commit 8234f6734c5d ("PM-runtime: Switch autosuspend
> over to using hrtimers") caused a regression on at least
> omap5-uevm where 8250 UART rx wake no longer works. I have not
> noticed this happening on others so far.
>
> The devices I've tested all are using 8250 with dedicated
> wakeirqs configured for the rx pin. I can see the interrupt
> increase on omap5-uevm after some one or more keypresses,
> but then nothing. It seems that the uart just falls back
> asleep right away or something.
>
> Any ideas what might be going wrong?
What is the autosuspend value ? Can it be that the autosuspend is set
to a short value but was finally greater than 10-20ms on arm32. And
now the autosuspend happens before and this has changed the sequence ?
Regards,
Vincent
>
> Regards,
>
> Tony
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists