[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <df42626b-425e-7971-a4b7-98e58dfac512@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2019 10:03:20 +0100
From: Michael Mueller <mimu@...ux.ibm.com>
To: pmorel@...ux.ibm.com, KVM Mailing List <kvm@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Linux-S390 Mailing List <linux-s390@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
Janosch Frank <frankja@...ux.ibm.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
Cornelia Huck <cohuck@...hat.com>,
Halil Pasic <pasic@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 15/15] KVM: s390: start using the GIB
On 02.01.19 18:45, Pierre Morel wrote:
> On 19/12/2018 20:17, Michael Mueller wrote:
>> By initializing the GIB, it will be used by the kvm host.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Michael Mueller <mimu@...ux.ibm.com>
>> ---
>> arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c | 8 +++++++-
>> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
>> index 2d10e175862c..777c8a87d81c 100644
>> --- a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
>> +++ b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
>> @@ -428,16 +428,22 @@ int kvm_arch_init(void *opaque)
>> goto out_debug_unreg;
>> }
>> + rc = kvm_s390_gib_init(GAL_ISC);
>> + if (rc)
>> + goto out_debug_unreg;
>> +
>
> Since it is the last introduced I have a preference to put the gib
> initialization after any existing initialization.
> it does not have influence them.
>
>> kvm_s390_cpu_feat_init();
>> /* Register floating interrupt controller interface. */
>> rc = kvm_register_device_ops(&kvm_flic_ops, KVM_DEV_TYPE_FLIC);
>> if (rc) {
>> pr_err("Failed to register FLIC rc=%d\n", rc);
>> - goto out_debug_unreg;
>> + goto out_gib_destroy;
>
> It is not a big problem but would make the patch more smaller by
> gathering all changes.
I will move that behind the FLIC registraion.
>
>> }
>> return 0;
>> +out_gib_destroy:
>> + kvm_s390_gib_destroy();
>> out_debug_unreg:
>> debug_unregister(kvm_s390_dbf);
>> return rc;
>>
>
> with these changes.
> Reviewed-by: Pierre Morel<pmorel@...ux.ibm.com>
>
>
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists