linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4.20 000/145] 4.20.1-stable review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190108093310.GA18042@kroah.com>
Date:   Tue, 8 Jan 2019 10:33:10 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
        Paul Burton <paul.burton@...s.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, shuah@...nel.org, patches@...nelci.org,
        ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org,
        stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.20 000/145] 4.20.1-stable review

On Tue, Jan 08, 2019 at 08:45:18AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 07, 2019 at 01:17:49PM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 07, 2019 at 01:30:37PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.20.1 release.
> > > There are 145 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > > let me know.
> > > 
> > > Responses should be made by Wed Jan  9 10:43:39 UTC 2019.
> > > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > > 
> > Building mipsel64:fuloong2e_defconfig:fulong2e:rootfs ... failed
> > ------------
> > Error log:
> > In file included from ./arch/mips/include/asm/mmzone.h:10:0,
> >                  from ./arch/mips/include/asm/r4kcache.h:23,
> > 		 from arch/mips/mm/c-r4k.c:33:
> > ./arch/mips/include/asm/mach-loongson64/mmzone.h:48:0: error: "NODE_DATA" redefined
> 
> This one is odd, let me dig...

Ok, commit 66a4059ba72c ("MIPS: Only include mmzone.h when CONFIG_NEED_MULTIPLE_NODES=y")
is supposed to fix this issue, but that is included here already.

So I don't know what to suggest, does this issue also show up in Linus's
tree?

Paul, any ideas what is happening here?

thanks,

greg k-h