linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm-current tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190108205019.63ee0e04@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:   Tue, 8 Jan 2019 20:50:19 +1100
From:   Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:     Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>
Cc:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm-current tree

Hi Anshuman,

On Tue, 8 Jan 2019 10:24:18 +0530 Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com> wrote:
>
> Just curious why the NUMA_NO_NODE definition did not get resolved from the local
> numa.h which had the same ones copied over from linux/numa.h but anyways the fix
> looks okay.

I assume that <numa.h> is /usr/include/numa.h (i.e. the system include
file which is whatever the distro installed) while <linux/numa.h> comes
out of the tools/include directory (i.e. the one we copied over from
the kernel source).

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped