[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190108121440.GC29102@lakrids.cambridge.arm.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2019 12:14:41 +0000
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
To: Miles Chen <miles.chen@...iatek.com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, wsd_upstream@...iatek.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: trap illegal translations in __virt_to_phys()
On Tue, Jan 08, 2019 at 11:24:43AM +0800, Miles Chen wrote:
> On Mon, 2019-01-07 at 15:00 +0000, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 07, 2019 at 07:21:20PM +0800, Miles Chen wrote:
> > > Current __virt_to_phys() only print warning messages for non-linear
> > > addresses. It's hard to catch all warnings by those messages.
> >
> > Why? Are you seeing a large number of warnings somewhere?
>
> Official kernel works fine. I saw some cases in our internal branch and
> we're fixing them.
>
> >
> > > So add a VIRTUAL_BUG_ON() to trap all non-linear and non-symbol
> > > addresses (e.g., stack addresses)
> > >
> > > Tested by pass stack addresses and symbol addresses to __pa(). Result:
> > > stack addresses: kernel BUG()
> >
> > Either:
> >
> > * Stacks are vmap'd, and __is_lm_address(stack_addr) is false. We'll
> > produce a WARNING() today (and return a junk physical address).
> >
> > * Stacks are linear mapped, and cannot be distinguished from other
> > linear mapped addresses. The physical address will be valid.
> >
> > ... so I don't understand why you need to change this.
>
> For the first case: for vmap'd stack, __pa() returns a junk
> physical address and it might be easier to debug this incorrect address
> translation by a BUG() call instead of monitoring the warning log.
I think that's an argument for upgrading the existing WARN() to a BUG(),
rather than adding a separate VIRTUAL_BUG_ON().
However, there are cases where the junk physical address is not used to
perform an access, and the WARN() is more helpful.
You can set panic_on_warn to get an immediate panic() when the WARN()
fires. Is there some reason that approach doesn't work for you?
Thanks,
Mark.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists