lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK9iUCNPD_mVkN-NnuCyCpZ8n17OqfjQxBeo=gUms_SMX91scg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 8 Jan 2019 08:03:05 -0500
From:   Sinan Kaya <Okaya@...nel.org>
To:     Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>
Cc:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
        Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
        Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@...il.com>,
        Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
        Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@...aro.org>,
        "open list:THERMAL" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 07/11] drivers: thermal: int3406_thermal: Make PCI
 dependency explicit

On Tue, Jan 8, 2019 at 6:58 AM Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com> wrote:
>
> On δΈ€, 2019-01-07 at 12:19 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Sat, Jan 5, 2019 at 11:06 AM Sinan Kaya <okaya@...nel.org> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > After 'commit 5d32a66541c4 ("PCI/ACPI: Allow ACPI to be built
> > > without
> > > CONFIG_PCI set")' dependencies on CONFIG_PCI that previously were
> > > satisfied implicitly through dependencies on CONFIG_ACPI have to be
> > > specified directly. Need CONFIG_PCI to be set in order to be able
> > > to use
> > > this driver.
> > >
> > > Fixes: 5d32a66541c46 ("PCI/ACPI: Allow ACPI to be built without
> > > CONFIG_PCI set")
> > > Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya <okaya@...nel.org>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/thermal/intel/int340x_thermal/Kconfig | 2 +-
> > >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/thermal/intel/int340x_thermal/Kconfig
> > > b/drivers/thermal/intel/int340x_thermal/Kconfig
> > > index 0582bd12a239..fba1976d5f8d 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/thermal/intel/int340x_thermal/Kconfig
> > > +++ b/drivers/thermal/intel/int340x_thermal/Kconfig
> > > @@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ if INT340X_THERMAL
> > >
> > >  config INT3406_THERMAL
> > >         tristate "ACPI INT3406 display thermal driver"
> > > -       depends on ACPI_VIDEO
> > > +       depends on ACPI_VIDEO && PCI
> > >         help
> > >           The display thermal device represents the LED/LCD display
> > > panel
> > >           that may or may not include touch support. The main
> > > function of
> > > --
> > Rui, any objections here?  And for the [11/11]?
>
> CONFIG_INT3406_THERMAL depends on CONFIG_INT340X_THERMAL, so IMO, patch
> 11 is sufficient.

Yes, we can drop this patch. I found the issues in reverse order. Can
we get an ACK for 11/11?

>
> thanks,
> rui

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ