[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190108130842.GD56789@e119886-lin.cambridge.arm.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2019 13:08:43 +0000
From: Andrew Murray <andrew.murray@....com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Richard Henderson <rth@...ddle.net>,
Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@...assic.park.msu.ru>,
Matt Turner <mattst88@...il.com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>, suzuki.poulose@....com,
robin.murphy@....com, Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
x86@...nel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-alpha@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 11/13] x86: perf/core: use PERF_PMU_CAP_NO_EXCLUDE for
exclude incapable PMUs
On Tue, Jan 08, 2019 at 11:49:40AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 07, 2019 at 04:27:28PM +0000, Andrew Murray wrote:
>
> This patch has the exact same subject as the previous one.. that seems
> sub-optimal.
Ah yes, I'll update that in subsquent revisions. (The reason for two patches
was to separate functional vs non-functional changes).
Andrew Murray
Powered by blists - more mailing lists