linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 0/8] net: y2038-safe socket timestamps

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAF=yD-LvYLA0u+HCzZv3++7=0bcNJyPv+SDAJENQYVBqEToBeA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 8 Jan 2019 08:53:03 -0500
From:   Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>
To:     Deepa Dinamani <deepa.kernel@...il.com>
Cc:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        y2038 Mailman List <y2038@...ts.linaro.org>,
        Chris Zankel <chris@...kel.net>, Helge Deller <deller@....de>,
        David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>, fenghua.yu@...el.com,
        isdn@...ux-pingi.de,
        "James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...isc-linux.org>,
        linux-afs@...ts.infradead.org, linux-alpha@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org,
        "open list:RALINK MIPS ARCHITECTURE" <linux-mips@...ux-mips.org>,
        Parisc List <linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-s390 <linux-s390@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-xtensa@...ux-xtensa.org, Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
        rth@...ddle.net, schwidefsky@...ibm.com,
        sparclinux <sparclinux@...r.kernel.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, ubraun@...ux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/8] net: y2038-safe socket timestamps

On Tue, Jan 8, 2019 at 8:37 AM Willem de Bruijn
<willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jan 7, 2019 at 10:29 PM Deepa Dinamani <deepa.kernel@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> > The series introduces new socket timestamps that are
> > y2038 safe.
> >
> > The time data types used for the existing socket timestamp
> > options: SO_TIMESTAMP, SO_TIMESTAMPNS and SO_TIMESTAMPING
> > are not y2038 safe. The series introduces SO_TIMESTAMP_NEW,
> > SO_TIMESTAMPNS_NEW and SO_TIMESTAMPING_NEW to replace these.
> > These new timestamps can be used on all architectures.
> >
> > The alternative considered was to extend the sys_setsockopt()
> > by using the flags. We did not receive any strong opinions about
> > either of the approaches. Hence, this was chosen, as glibc folks
> > preferred this.
> >
> > The series does not deal with updating the internal kernel socket
> > calls like rxrpc to make them y2038 safe. This will be dealt
> > with separately.
> >
> > Note that the timestamps behavior already does not match the
> > man page specific behavior:
> > SIOCGSTAMP
> >     This ioctl should only be used if the socket option SO_TIMESTAMP
> >         is not set on the socket. Otherwise, it returns the timestamp of
> >         the last packet that was received while SO_TIMESTAMP was not set,
> >         or it fails if no such packet has been received,
> >         (i.e., ioctl(2) returns -1 with errno set to ENOENT).
> >
> > The recommendation is to update the man page to remove the above statement.
> >
> > The overview of the series is as below:
> > 1. Delete asm specific socket.h when possible.
> > 2. Support SO/SCM_TIMESTAMP* options only in userspace.
> > 3. Rename current SO/SCM_TIMESTAMP* to SO/SCM_TIMESTAMP*_OLD.
> > 3. Alter socket options so that SOCK_RCVTSTAMPNS does
> >    not rely on SOCK_RCVTSTAMP.
> > 4. Introduce y2038 safe types for socket timestamp.
> > 5. Introduce new y2038 safe socket options SO/SCM_TIMESTAMP*_NEW.
> >
> > Changes since v2:
> > * Removed extra functions to reduce diff churn as per code review
>
> Thanks, Deepa. This set looks great to me.
>
> One issue, it does not apply cleanly to current davem-net-next/master
> for me. A conflict on patch 7. It does apply cleanly on davem-net
> master. Please rebase and also send with [PATCH net-next].

to be clear, with the version, so this will be [PATCH net-next v4].