linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] hv_balloon: avoid touching uninitialized struct page during tail onlining

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87muob1aml.fsf@vitty.brq.redhat.com>
Date:   Tue, 08 Jan 2019 15:34:26 +0100
From:   Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>
To:     Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Cc:     Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>,
        Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@...rosoft.com>,
        David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
        Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devel@...uxdriverproject.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] hv_balloon: avoid touching uninitialized struct page during tail onlining

Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com> writes:

> On Mon, Jan 07, 2019 at 07:38:20PM +0100, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
>> (I remember Greg disliked when people were tagging patches for stable@
>> themselves, he prefered maintainers deciding if the particular commit
>> deserves stable@ or not - but as you have a tree now we may as well have
>> different rules :-)
>
> You're thinking of Dave Miller.  So far as I know he's the only
> maintainer who handles stable that way.

This may actually be the case, you think "one of the the mighty Linux
overlords" but your fingers type "Greg" instread. Sorry for the
confusion :-)

-- 
Vitaly