linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v7 2/2] selftests: add tests for pidfd_send

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190108181742.GA22614@mail.hallyn.com>
Date:   Tue, 8 Jan 2019 12:17:42 -0600
From:   "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>
To:     Tycho Andersen <tycho@...ho.ws>
Cc:     "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>,
        Christian Brauner <christian@...uner.io>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
        luto@...nel.org, arnd@...db.de, keescook@...omium.org,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, jannh@...gle.com, oleg@...hat.com,
        cyphar@...har.com, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, dancol@...gle.com,
        timmurray@...gle.com, fweimer@...hat.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
        x86@...nel.org, ebiederm@...ssion.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 2/2] selftests: add tests for pidfd_send_signal()

On Tue, Jan 08, 2019 at 10:58:43AM -0700, Tycho Andersen wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 08, 2019 at 11:54:15AM -0600, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 08, 2019 at 10:53:06AM -0700, Tycho Andersen wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jan 02, 2019 at 05:16:54PM +0100, Christian Brauner wrote:
> > > > +			/*
> > > > +			 * Stop the child so we can inspect whether we have
> > > > +			 * recycled pid PID_RECYCLE.
> > > > +			 */
> > > > +			close(pipe_fds[0]);
> > > > +			ret = kill(recycled_pid, SIGSTOP);
> > > > +			close(pipe_fds[1]);
> > > > +			if (ret) {
> > > > +				(void)wait_for_pid(recycled_pid);
> > > > +				_exit(PIDFD_ERROR);
> > > > +			}
> > > 
> > > Sorry for being late to the party, but I wonder if this whole thing
> > > couldn't be simplified with /proc/sys/kenrel/ns_last_pid?
> > 
> > no, bc it's not namespaced :)
> 
> Huh? It looks like it is...
> 
> static int pid_ns_ctl_handler(struct ctl_table *table, int write,
>                 void __user *buffer, size_t *lenp, loff_t *ppos)
> {
>         struct pid_namespace *pid_ns = task_active_pid_ns(current);
>         struct ctl_table tmp = *table;
>         int ret, next;
> 
>         if (write && !ns_capable(pid_ns->user_ns, CAP_SYS_ADMIN))
>                 return -EPERM;
> 
>         ...

Oh - hah, but that's ns_last_pid.  You'd want pid_max.  And that one
is not namespaced.