lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 9 Jan 2019 12:33:37 -0700
From:   Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com>
To:     Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-ntb@...glegroups.com, Jon Mason <jdmason@...zu.us>
Cc:     Allen Hubbe <allenbh@...il.com>,
        Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/8] Fix breakage caused by the NTB multi-port patchset



On 2019-01-09 12:32 p.m., Dave Jiang wrote:
>> I'm resending this because I've recently found out that the change we
>> made to use the NTB struct device in DMA allocations is wrong and
>> needs to be reverted. Turns out that, when running with an IOMMU,
>> dma_alloc_coherent() will always fail if you pass it the NTB struct
>> device. This is because the device has not been assigned an IOMMU
>> group and the Intel IOMMU at least expect the devices to be on the PCI
>> bus and be able to find a proper bus-dev-fn number through a struct
>> pci device. Therefore, we must revert the change and I've changed
>> patch 2 to do this and remove the no longer necessary DMA mask
>> adjustments.
> 
> For the revert, I think we should cc stable as well.

I agree it should go into stable too. But I thought the fixes tag would
make that happen...

Logan

Powered by blists - more mailing lists