[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <df59c10d-7038-cb4a-45f0-7420254c6398@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2019 21:12:15 +0100
From: Jacek Anaszewski <jacek.anaszewski@...il.com>
To: Dan Murphy <dmurphy@...com>, robh+dt@...nel.org, pavel@....cz
Cc: devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-leds@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt: bindings: lp5024: Introduce the lp5024 and lp5018
RGB driver
Hi Dan,
On 1/8/19 10:22 PM, Dan Murphy wrote:
> On 1/8/19 3:16 PM, Jacek Anaszewski wrote:
>> On 1/8/19 9:53 PM, Dan Murphy wrote:
>>> Jacek
>>>
>>> On 1/8/19 2:33 PM, Jacek Anaszewski wrote:
>>>> Dan,
>>>>
>>>> On 12/19/18 5:26 PM, Dan Murphy wrote:
>>>>> Introduce the bindings for the Texas Instruments LP5024 and the LP5018
>>>>> RGB LED device driver. The LP5024/18 can control RGB LEDs individually
>>>>> or as part of a control bank group. These devices have the ability
>>>>> to adjust the mixing control for the RGB LEDs to obtain different colors
>>>>> independent of the overall brightness of the LED grouping.
>>>>>
>>>>> Datasheet:
>>>>> http://www.ti.com/lit/ds/symlink/lp5024.pdf
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Dan Murphy <dmurphy@...com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> .../devicetree/bindings/leds/leds-lp5024.txt | 63 +++++++++++++++++++
>>>>> 1 file changed, 63 insertions(+)
>>>>> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/leds-lp5024.txt
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/leds-lp5024.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/leds-lp5024.txt
>>>>> new file mode 100644
>>>>> index 000000000000..9567aa6f7813
>>>>> --- /dev/null
>>>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/leds-lp5024.txt
>>>>> @@ -0,0 +1,63 @@
>>>>> +* Texas Instruments - LP5024/18 RGB LED driver
>>>>> +
>>>>> +The LM3692x is an ultra-compact, highly efficient,
>>>>> +white-LED driver designed for LCD display backlighting.
>>>>> +
>>>>> +The main difference between the LP5024 and L5018 is the number of
>>>>> +RGB LEDs they support. The LP5024 supports twenty four strings while the
>>>>> +LP5018 supports eighteen strings.
>>>>> +
>>>>> +Required properties:
>>>>> + - compatible:
>>>>> + "ti,lp5018"
>>>>> + "ti,lp5024"
>>>>> + - reg : I2C slave address
>>>>> + - #address-cells : 1
>>>>> + - #size-cells : 0
>>>>> +
>>>>> +Optional properties:
>>>>> + - enable-gpios : gpio pin to enable/disable the device.
>>>>> + - vled-supply : LED supply
>>>>> +
>>>>> +Required child properties:
>>>>> + - reg : Is the child node iteration.
>>>>> + - led-sources : LP5024 - 0 - 7
>>>>> + LP5018 - 0 - 5
>>>>> + Declares the LED string or strings that the child node
>>>>> + will control. If ti,control-bank is set then this
>>>>> + property will contain multiple LED IDs.
>>>>> +
>>>>> +Optional child properties:
>>>>> + - label : see Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/common.txt
>>>>> + - linux,default-trigger :
>>>>> + see Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/common.txt
>>>>> + - ti,control-bank : Indicates that the LED strings declared in the
>>>>> + led-sources property are grouped within a control
>>>>> + bank for brightness and mixing control.
>>>>> +
>>>>> +Example:
>>>>> +
>>>>> +led-controller@28 {
>>>>> + compatible = "ti,lp5024";
>>>>> + reg = <0x28>;
>>>>> + #address-cells = <1>;
>>>>> + #size-cells = <0>;
>>>>> +
>>>>> + enable-gpios = <&gpio1 28 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
>>>>> + vled-supply = <&vbatt>;
>>>>> +
>>>>> + led@0 {
>>>>> + reg = <0>;
>>>>> + led-sources = <1>;
>>>>> + };
>>>>> +
>>>>> + led@1 {
>>>>> + reg = <1>;
>>>>> + led-sources = <0 6>;
>>>>> + ti,control-bank;
>>>>
>>>> Do you really need ti,control-bank? Doesn't led-sources array size
>>>> greater than 1 mean that the node describes control bank?
>>>>
>>>
>>> That will work too.
>>
>>>> Also, does it make sense to have only two LEDs in the bank?
>>>
>>> The array can populate all 7 LEDs in a single node. I only show 2 here as the example.
>>> See the description above of the led-sources
>>
>> OK, I confused RGB LED modules with banks.
>>
>> Shouldn't we allow for defining either strings or RGB LED
>> triplets somehow then?
>>
>
> Well that is what this should be doing. If you define a single LED in LED sources then
> the triplet is controlled via the associated LEDx_brightness register.
led-sources should map to iouts directly.
So, for RGB LED modules I would expect:
LED0: led-sources = <0 1 2>;
LED1: led-sources = <3 4 5>;
LED2: led-sources = <6 7 8>;
and so on.
for banks:
Bank A with iouts 0,3,6,9: led-sources<0 3 6 9>;
Bank B with iouts 2,4,10: led-sources<2 4 10>;
Bank C with iouts 5,8,11,14,17: led-sources<5 8 11 14 17>;
We could additionally mark banks with ti,control-bank,
but I'm not sure if it would ease parsing, since
you will have to validate iouts configuration anyway.
> If you have multiple LED sources defined in the led-sources then those LEDs would be grouped in the bank.
> I guess I need to provide some protection or a warning if a DT defines two banks because there is only one bank control.
Does the hardware allow the IOUT to belong to an RGB LED module
and to a bank in the same time?
--
Best regards,
Jacek Anaszewski
Powered by blists - more mailing lists