[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190109210748.29074-5-paulmck@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2019 13:07:46 -0800
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.ibm.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
mingo@...nel.org
Cc: stern@...land.harvard.edu, parri.andrea@...il.com,
will.deacon@....com, peterz@...radead.org, boqun.feng@...il.com,
npiggin@...il.com, dhowells@...hat.com, j.alglave@....ac.uk,
luc.maranget@...ia.fr, willy@...radead.org,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH RFC LKMM 5/7] docs/memory-barriers.txt: Enforce heavy ordering for port I/O accesses
From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
David Laight explains:
| A long time ago there was a document from Intel that said that
| inb/outb weren't necessarily synchronised wrt memory accesses.
| (Might be P-pro era). However no processors actually behaved that
| way and more recent docs say that inb/outb are fully ordered.
This also reflects the situation on other architectures, the the port
accessor macros tend to be implemented in terms of readX/writeX.
Update Documentation/memory-barriers.txt to reflect reality.
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>
Cc: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.ibm.com>
---
Documentation/memory-barriers.txt | 6 ++----
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/memory-barriers.txt b/Documentation/memory-barriers.txt
index 1c22b21ae922..a70104e2a087 100644
--- a/Documentation/memory-barriers.txt
+++ b/Documentation/memory-barriers.txt
@@ -2619,10 +2619,8 @@ functions:
intermediary bridges (such as the PCI host bridge) may not fully honour
that.
- They are guaranteed to be fully ordered with respect to each other.
-
- They are not guaranteed to be fully ordered with respect to other types of
- memory and I/O operation.
+ They are guaranteed to be fully ordered with respect to each other and
+ also with respect to other types of memory and I/O operation.
(*) readX(), writeX():
--
2.17.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists