[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <bfb543b6e343c21c3e263a110f234e08@codeaurora.org>
Date: Wed, 09 Jan 2019 11:28:52 +0530
From: Arun KS <arunks@...eaurora.org>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
Cc: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@...ux.intel.com>,
arunks.linux@...il.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, vbabka@...e.cz,
osalvador@...e.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, getarunks@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7] mm/page_alloc.c: memory_hotplug: free pages as higher
order
On 2019-01-08 23:43, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Tue 08-01-19 09:56:09, Alexander Duyck wrote:
>> On Fri, 2019-01-04 at 10:31 +0530, Arun KS wrote:
> [...]
>> > static int online_pages_range(unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long nr_pages,
>> > void *arg)
>> > {
>> > - unsigned long i;
>> > unsigned long onlined_pages = *(unsigned long *)arg;
>> > - struct page *page;
>> >
>> > if (PageReserved(pfn_to_page(start_pfn)))
>> > - for (i = 0; i < nr_pages; i++) {
>> > - page = pfn_to_page(start_pfn + i);
>> > - (*online_page_callback)(page);
>> > - onlined_pages++;
>> > - }
>> > + onlined_pages = online_pages_blocks(start_pfn, nr_pages);
>>
>> Shouldn't this be a "+=" instead of an "="? It seems like you are
>> going
>> to lose your count otherwise.
>
> You are right of course. I should have noticed during the review.
> Thanks!
I think we don't need to. The caller function is setting onlined_pages =
0 before calling online_pages_range().
And there are no other reference to online_pages_range other than from
online_pages().
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/mm/memory_hotplug.c?h=v5.0-rc1#n845
int __ref online_pages(unsigned long pfn, unsigned long nr_pages, int
online_type)
{
unsigned long flags;
unsigned long onlined_pages = 0;
Regards,
Arun
Powered by blists - more mailing lists