[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0hi5sVESKPbZoniikOhNxdUDtJhQrs39Fib8B03MYoMMQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2019 10:43:51 +0100
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
"open list:THERMAL" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
LAK <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Linux OMAP Mailing List <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Regression in v5.0-rc1 with autosuspend hrtimers
On Wed, Jan 9, 2019 at 2:51 AM Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com> wrote:
>
> * Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org> [190109 01:42]:
> > Le Tuesday 08 Jan 2019 à 13:37:43 (-0800), Tony Lindgren a écrit :
> > > Lowering the autosuspend_delay_ms to 2100 ms makes things work again.
> > > Anything higher than 2200 ms seems to somehow time out immediately
> > > now :)
> >
> > This is quite close to the max ns of an int on arm 32bits
> >
> > Could you try the patch below ?
>
> Yup great thanks, that's it:
>
> Tested-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
Cool. Thanks for getting to the bottom of this!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists