lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190109121352.GI6310@bombadil.infradead.org>
Date:   Wed, 9 Jan 2019 04:13:52 -0800
From:   Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
To:     Peng Wang <rocking@....edu.cn>
Cc:     cl@...ux.com, penberg@...nel.org, rientjes@...gle.com,
        iamjoonsoo.kim@....com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/slub.c: re-randomize random_seq if necessary

On Wed, Jan 09, 2019 at 05:06:27PM +0800, Peng Wang wrote:
> calculate_sizes() could be called in several places
> like (red_zone/poison/order/store_user)_store() while
> random_seq remains unchanged.
> 
> If random_seq is not NULL in calculate_sizes(), re-randomize it.

Why do we want to re-randomise the slab at these points?

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ