[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1547041383-16924-1-git-send-email-krzk@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2019 14:43:03 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Kukjin Kim <kgene@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Paweł Chmiel <pawel.mikolaj.chmiel@...il.com>,
Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH] ARM: dts: s5pv210: Fix onenand's unit address format warning
According to Devicetree specification, the unit-address must match the
first address specified in the reg property of the node. Fix the DTC
warning onenand node:
arch/arm/boot/dts/s5pv210.dtsi:81.29-93.5:
Warning (simple_bus_reg): /soc/onenand@...00000: simple-bus unit address format error, expected "b0600000"
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
---
The remaining warning is wrong clock-controller subnode of fimc camera.
arch/arm/boot/dts/s5pv210.dtsi:578.32-580.6: Warning (simple_bus_reg): /soc/camera/clock-controller: missing or empty reg/ranges property
The subnode in my understanding does not follow bindings and the driver.
The driver with current s5pv210.dtsi will not register a clock provider... but
I do not have a device to confirm this.
---
arch/arm/boot/dts/s5pv210.dtsi | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/s5pv210.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/s5pv210.dtsi
index cc22c9db80d2..26ea5c66d8ce 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/s5pv210.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/s5pv210.dtsi
@@ -78,7 +78,7 @@
};
};
- onenand: onenand@...00000 {
+ onenand: onenand@...00000 {
compatible = "samsung,s5pv210-onenand";
reg = <0xb0600000 0x2000>,
<0xb0000000 0x20000>,
--
2.7.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists