| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <e23a079aa090b393666c413d57440765@codeaurora.org>
Date: Wed, 09 Jan 2019 20:09:19 +0530
From: Sibi Sankar <sibis@...eaurora.org>
To: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>
Cc: Andy Gross <andy.gross@...aro.org>,
David Brown <david.brown@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
Arun Kumar Neelakantam <aneela@...eaurora.org>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-soc@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel-owner@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/7] remoteproc: q6v5-mss: Vote for rpmh power domains
Hi Bjorn,
With the changes suggested below:
Reviewed-by: Sibi Sankar <sibis@...eaurora.org>
Tested-by: Sibi Sankar <sibis@...eaurora.org>
On 2019-01-06 13:39, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> From: Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@...eaurora.org>
>
> With rpmh ARC resources being modelled as power domains with
> performance
> state, we need to proxy vote on these for SDM845.
> Add support to vote on multiple of them, now that genpd supports
> associating mutliple power domains to a device.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@...eaurora.org>
> [bjorn: Drop device link, improve error handling, name things "proxy"]
> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>
> ---
>
> This is v3 of this patch, but updated to cover "loadstate". v2 can be
> found here:
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20180904071046.8152-1-rnayak@codeaurora.org/
>
> Changes since v2:
> - Drop device links, as we can do active and proxy votes using device
> links
> - Improved error handling, by unrolling some votes on failure
> - Rename things proxy, to follow naming of "proxy" and "active"
>
> drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_mss.c | 115 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 111 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_mss.c
> b/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_mss.c
> index 01be7314e176..62cf16ddb7af 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_mss.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_mss.c
> @@ -25,6 +25,8 @@
> #include <linux/of_address.h>
> #include <linux/of_device.h>
> #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> +#include <linux/pm_domain.h>
> +#include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
> #include <linux/regmap.h>
> #include <linux/regulator/consumer.h>
> #include <linux/remoteproc.h>
> @@ -131,6 +133,7 @@ struct rproc_hexagon_res {
> char **proxy_clk_names;
> char **reset_clk_names;
> char **active_clk_names;
> + char **proxy_pd_names;
> int version;
> bool need_mem_protection;
> bool has_alt_reset;
> @@ -156,9 +159,11 @@ struct q6v5 {
> struct clk *active_clks[8];
> struct clk *reset_clks[4];
> struct clk *proxy_clks[4];
> + struct device *proxy_pds[3];
> int active_clk_count;
> int reset_clk_count;
> int proxy_clk_count;
> + int proxy_pd_count;
>
> struct reg_info active_regs[1];
> struct reg_info proxy_regs[3];
> @@ -321,6 +326,41 @@ static void q6v5_clk_disable(struct device *dev,
> clk_disable_unprepare(clks[i]);
> }
>
> +static int q6v5_pds_enable(struct q6v5 *qproc, struct device **pds,
> + size_t pd_count)
> +{
> + int ret;
> + int i;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < pd_count; i++) {
> + dev_pm_genpd_set_performance_state(pds[i], INT_MAX);
> + ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(pds[i]);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + goto unroll_pd_votes;
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +
> +unroll_pd_votes:
> + for (i--; i >= 0; i--) {
> + dev_pm_genpd_set_performance_state(pds[i], 0);
> + pm_runtime_put(pds[i]);
> + }
> +
> + return ret;
> +};
> +
> +static void q6v5_pds_disable(struct q6v5 *qproc, struct device **pds,
> + size_t pd_count)
> +{
> + int i;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < pd_count; i++) {
> + dev_pm_genpd_set_performance_state(pds[i], 0);
> + pm_runtime_put(pds[i]);
> + }
> +}
> +
> static int q6v5_xfer_mem_ownership(struct q6v5 *qproc, int
> *current_perm,
> bool remote_owner, phys_addr_t addr,
> size_t size)
> @@ -690,11 +730,17 @@ static int q6v5_mba_load(struct q6v5 *qproc)
>
> qcom_q6v5_prepare(&qproc->q6v5);
>
> + ret = q6v5_pds_enable(qproc, qproc->proxy_pds,
> qproc->proxy_pd_count);
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + dev_err(qproc->dev, "failed to enable proxy power domains\n");
> + goto disable_irqs;
> + }
> +
> ret = q6v5_regulator_enable(qproc, qproc->proxy_regs,
> qproc->proxy_reg_count);
> if (ret) {
> dev_err(qproc->dev, "failed to enable proxy supplies\n");
> - goto disable_irqs;
> + goto disable_proxy_pds;
> }
>
> ret = q6v5_clk_enable(qproc->dev, qproc->proxy_clks,
> @@ -791,6 +837,8 @@ static int q6v5_mba_load(struct q6v5 *qproc)
> disable_proxy_reg:
> q6v5_regulator_disable(qproc, qproc->proxy_regs,
> qproc->proxy_reg_count);
> +disable_proxy_pds:
> + q6v5_pds_disable(qproc, qproc->proxy_pds, qproc->proxy_pd_count);
> disable_irqs:
> qcom_q6v5_unprepare(&qproc->q6v5);
>
> @@ -1121,6 +1169,7 @@ static void qcom_msa_handover(struct qcom_q6v5
> *q6v5)
> qproc->proxy_clk_count);
> q6v5_regulator_disable(qproc, qproc->proxy_regs,
> qproc->proxy_reg_count);
> + q6v5_pds_disable(qproc, qproc->proxy_pds, qproc->proxy_pd_count);
we should call proxy pds_disable on mba_reclaim
as well:
ret = qcom_q6v5_unprepare(&qproc->q6v5);
if (ret) {
...
q6v5_pds_disable(...);
}
> }
>
> static int q6v5_init_mem(struct q6v5 *qproc, struct platform_device
> *pdev)
> @@ -1181,6 +1230,45 @@ static int q6v5_init_clocks(struct device *dev,
> struct clk **clks,
> return i;
> }
>
> +static int q6v5_pds_attach(struct device *dev, struct device **devs,
> + char **pd_names)
> +{
> + size_t num_pds = 0;
> + int ret;
> + int i;
> +
> + if (!pd_names)
> + return 0;
> +
> + while (pd_names[num_pds])
> + num_pds++;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < num_pds; i++) {
> + devs[i] = dev_pm_domain_attach_by_name(dev, pd_names[i]);
> + if (IS_ERR(devs[i])) {
> + ret = PTR_ERR(devs[i]);
> + goto unroll_attach;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + return num_pds;
> +
> +unroll_attach:
> + for (i--; i >= 0; i--)
> + dev_pm_domain_detach(devs[i], false);
> +
> + return ret;
> +};
> +
> +static void q6v5_pds_detach(struct q6v5 *qproc, struct device **pds,
> + size_t pd_count)
> +{
> + int i;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < pd_count; i++)
> + dev_pm_domain_detach(pds[i], false);
> +}
> +
> static int q6v5_init_reset(struct q6v5 *qproc)
> {
> qproc->mss_restart = devm_reset_control_get_exclusive(qproc->dev,
> @@ -1322,10 +1410,18 @@ static int q6v5_probe(struct platform_device
> *pdev)
> }
> qproc->active_reg_count = ret;
>
> + ret = q6v5_pds_attach(&pdev->dev, qproc->proxy_pds,
> + desc->proxy_pd_names);
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to init power domains\n");
Should be "Failed to attach proxy power domains"
> + goto free_rproc;
> + }
> + qproc->proxy_pd_count = ret;
> +
> qproc->has_alt_reset = desc->has_alt_reset;
> ret = q6v5_init_reset(qproc);
> if (ret)
> - goto free_rproc;
> + goto detach_proxy_pds;
>
> qproc->version = desc->version;
> qproc->need_mem_protection = desc->need_mem_protection;
> @@ -1333,7 +1429,7 @@ static int q6v5_probe(struct platform_device
> *pdev)
> ret = qcom_q6v5_init(&qproc->q6v5, pdev, rproc,
> MPSS_CRASH_REASON_SMEM,
> qcom_msa_handover);
> if (ret)
> - goto free_rproc;
> + goto detach_proxy_pds;
>
> qproc->mpss_perm = BIT(QCOM_SCM_VMID_HLOS);
> qproc->mba_perm = BIT(QCOM_SCM_VMID_HLOS);
> @@ -1344,10 +1440,12 @@ static int q6v5_probe(struct platform_device
> *pdev)
>
> ret = rproc_add(rproc);
> if (ret)
> - goto free_rproc;
> + goto detach_proxy_pds;
>
> return 0;
>
> +detach_proxy_pds:
> + q6v5_pds_detach(qproc, qproc->proxy_pds, qproc->proxy_pd_count);
> free_rproc:
> rproc_free(rproc);
>
> @@ -1364,6 +1462,9 @@ static int q6v5_remove(struct platform_device
> *pdev)
> qcom_remove_glink_subdev(qproc->rproc, &qproc->glink_subdev);
> qcom_remove_smd_subdev(qproc->rproc, &qproc->smd_subdev);
> qcom_remove_ssr_subdev(qproc->rproc, &qproc->ssr_subdev);
> +
> + q6v5_pds_detach(qproc, qproc->proxy_pds, qproc->proxy_pd_count);
> +
> rproc_free(qproc->rproc);
>
> return 0;
> @@ -1388,6 +1489,12 @@ static const struct rproc_hexagon_res sdm845_mss
> = {
> "mnoc_axi",
> NULL
> },
> + .proxy_pd_names = (char*[]){
> + "cx",
> + "mx",
> + "mss",
> + NULL
> + },
> .need_mem_protection = true,
> .has_alt_reset = true,
> .version = MSS_SDM845,
--
-- Sibi Sankar --
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists