[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190109162846.GP5544@atomide.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2019 08:28:46 -0800
From: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
Cc: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
"open list:THERMAL" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
LAK <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Linux OMAP Mailing List <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
Ladislav Michl <ladis@...ux-mips.org>
Subject: Re: Regression in v5.0-rc1 with autosuspend hrtimers
* Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@...nel.org> [190109 09:44]:
> On Wed, Jan 9, 2019 at 2:51 AM Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com> wrote:
> >
> > * Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org> [190109 01:42]:
> > > Le Tuesday 08 Jan 2019 à 13:37:43 (-0800), Tony Lindgren a écrit :
> > > > Lowering the autosuspend_delay_ms to 2100 ms makes things work again.
> > > > Anything higher than 2200 ms seems to somehow time out immediately
> > > > now :)
> > >
> > > This is quite close to the max ns of an int on arm 32bits
> > >
> > > Could you try the patch below ?
> >
> > Yup great thanks, that's it:
> >
> > Tested-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
>
> Cool. Thanks for getting to the bottom of this!
No problem.
One more thing I noticed: The 25% slack can get noticeable
for larger values. For things like a 3 second uart console
timeout slack of 750 ms is quite large variation.
Should we have a limit of max 100 ms for the slack?
Regards,
Tony
Powered by blists - more mailing lists