[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190109164915.GB19455@krava>
Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2019 17:49:15 +0100
From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
To: Alexey Budankov <alexey.budankov@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] perf record: bind the AIO user space buffers to
nodes
On Wed, Jan 09, 2019 at 12:12:37PM +0300, Alexey Budankov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 02.01.2019 0:41, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 24, 2018 at 03:24:36PM +0300, Alexey Budankov wrote:
> >
> > SNIP
> >
> >> +static void perf_mmap__aio_free(void **data, size_t len __maybe_unused)
> >> +{
> >> + zfree(data);
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> +static void perf_mmap__aio_bind(void *data __maybe_unused, size_t len __maybe_unused,
> >> + int cpu __maybe_unused, int affinity __maybe_unused)
> >> +{
> >> +}
> >> +#endif
> >> +
> >> static int perf_mmap__aio_mmap(struct perf_mmap *map, struct mmap_params *mp)
> >> {
> >> int delta_max, i, prio;
> >> @@ -177,11 +220,13 @@ static int perf_mmap__aio_mmap(struct perf_mmap *map, struct mmap_params *mp)
> >> }
> >> delta_max = sysconf(_SC_AIO_PRIO_DELTA_MAX);
> >> for (i = 0; i < map->aio.nr_cblocks; ++i) {
> >> - map->aio.data[i] = malloc(perf_mmap__mmap_len(map));
> >> + size_t mmap_len = perf_mmap__mmap_len(map);
> >> + perf_mmap__aio_alloc(&(map->aio.data[i]), mmap_len);
> >> if (!map->aio.data[i]) {
> >> pr_debug2("failed to allocate data buffer area, error %m");
> >> return -1;
> >> }
> >> + perf_mmap__aio_bind(map->aio.data[i], mmap_len, map->cpu, mp->affinity);
> >
> > this all does not work if bind fails.. I think we need to
> > propagate the error value here and fail
>
> Proceeding further from this point still makes sense because
> the buffer is available for operations and thread migration
> alone can bring performance benefits. So the error is not fatal
> and an explicit warning is implemented in v3. If you still think
> it is better to propagate error from here it can be implemented.
so if that fails that the aio buffers won't be bound to node,
while mmaps are, so I guess the speedup is from there?
if I use:
# perf record --aio --affinity=node
and see:
"failed to bind..."
I can still see the benefit..? I guess the warning is ok then,
another option seems confusing
jirka
Powered by blists - more mailing lists