linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] vfio:iommu: Use capabilities do report IOMMU informations

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <bd36cddc-cce1-adc1-cab8-d6df2089e931@linux.ibm.com>
Date:   Wed, 9 Jan 2019 18:07:19 +0100
From:   Pierre Morel <pmorel@...ux.ibm.com>
To:     Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>
Cc:     kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        walling@...ux.ibm.com, cohuck@...hat.com, david@...hat.com,
        pasic@...ux.ibm.com, thuth@...hat.com,
        Shameerali Kolothum Thodi 
        <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] vfio:iommu: Use capabilities do report IOMMU
 informations

On 09/01/2019 16:37, Alex Williamson wrote:
> On Wed,  9 Jan 2019 13:41:53 +0100
> Pierre Morel <pmorel@...ux.ibm.com> wrote:
> 
>> We add a new flag, VFIO_IOMMU_INFO_CAPABILITIES, inside the
>> vfio_iommu_type1_info to specify the support for capabilities.
>>
>> We add a new capability, with id VFIO_IOMMU_INFO_CAP_DMA
>> in the capability list of the VFIO_IOMMU_GET_INFO ioctl.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Pierre Morel <pmorel@...ux.ibm.com>
>> ---
>>   include/uapi/linux/vfio.h | 9 +++++++++
>>   1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h b/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h
>> index 8131028..54c4fcb 100644
>> --- a/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h
>> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h
>> @@ -669,6 +669,15 @@ struct vfio_iommu_type1_info {
>>   	__u32	flags;
>>   #define VFIO_IOMMU_INFO_PGSIZES (1 << 0)	/* supported page sizes info */
>>   	__u64	iova_pgsizes;		/* Bitmap of supported page sizes */
>> +#define VFIO_IOMMU_INFO_CAPABILITIES (1 << 1)  /* support capabilities info */
>> +	__u64   cap_offset;     /* Offset within info struct of first cap */
>> +};
>> +
>> +#define VFIO_IOMMU_INFO_CAP_DMA 1
>> +struct vfio_iommu_cap_dma {
>> +	struct vfio_info_cap_header header;
>> +	__u64   dma_start;
>> +	__u64   dma_end;
>>   };
>>   
>>   #define VFIO_IOMMU_GET_INFO _IO(VFIO_TYPE, VFIO_BASE + 12)
> 
> Unfortunately for most systems, a simple start and end is not really
> sufficient to describe the available IOVA space, there are often
> reserved regions intermixed, so this is not really a complete
> solution.  Shameer tried to solve this last year[1] but we ran into a
> road block that Intel IGD devices impose a reserved range of IOVA
> spaces reported to the user that conflict with existing assignment of
> this device and we haven't figured out yet how to be more selective of
> the enforcement of those reserved ranges.  Thanks,
> 
> Alex
> 
> [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/4/18/293
> 

I understand that some architecture may be more complex and have special 
needs.
However the IOMMU geometry is a constant for all IOMMU devices and
is reported by the geometry in the iommu operations.

This makes the IOMMU geometry a special case.
It is also a special case because it is an inclusive description of 
available memory, to oppose to the exclusive description given by the 
windows.

Isn't it possible to separate the IOMMU geometry, which is really 
related to the IOMMU chip, from other windows exclusion related to the 
system memory mapping?

Retrieving the IOMMU geometry is very important for us because the 
driver inside the guest must get it and program the IOMMU based on these 
values.

Regards,
Pierre


-- 
Pierre Morel
Linux/KVM/QEMU in Böblingen - Germany