| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CAKfTPtBGh+ShbNCZLiYr4PZJooun7uctuQaomc40czvAk5Yizg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2019 19:04:48 +0100
From: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
To: Ladislav Michl <ladis@...ux-mips.org>
Cc: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
"open list:THERMAL" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
LAK <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Linux OMAP Mailing List <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Regression in v5.0-rc1 with autosuspend hrtimers
On Wed, 9 Jan 2019 at 18:26, Ladislav Michl <ladis@...ux-mips.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 09, 2019 at 05:32:31PM +0100, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> > On Wed, 9 Jan 2019 at 17:07, Ladislav Michl <ladis@...ux-mips.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jan 09, 2019 at 03:12:25PM +0100, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> > > > Please keep all thread list when replying :-)
> > >
> > > Ahh, sorry for that...
> > > [snip]
> > > > On Wed, 9 Jan 2019 at 14:33, Ladislav Michl <ladis@...ux-mips.org> wrote:
> > > > > I agree, but it doea all the magic correctly, so you won't need
> > > > > to touch that code is ktime_t changes (I know, unlikely..)
> > > >
> > > > But the current implementation doesn't care of any changes in ktime_t
> > > > as it uses raw ns
> > >
> > > Fair enough, so let's go back to:
> >
> > This one looks good for me
>
> Lets split is for 'comments fix' patch, which was just send and 'the rest'.
> Now, 'the rest' can either be v2 of your "PM/runtime: Fix autosuspend_delay on
> 32bits arch" or will wait for 5.1. You decide :)
I don't really mind.
Rafael,
Do you prefer to only take the fix for u64 casting problem or do you
prefer to also take the optimization below in one single patch ?
>
> > > diff --git a/drivers/base/power/runtime.c b/drivers/base/power/runtime.c
> > > index 70624695b6d5..e61ee9b47a26 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/base/power/runtime.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/base/power/runtime.c
> > > @@ -121,7 +121,7 @@ static void pm_runtime_cancel_pending(struct device *dev)
> > > * Compute the autosuspend-delay expiration time based on the device's
> > > * power.last_busy time. If the delay has already expired or is disabled
> > > * (negative) or the power.use_autosuspend flag isn't set, return 0.
> > > - * Otherwise return the expiration time in jiffies (adjusted to be nonzero).
> > > + * Otherwise return the expiration time in nanoseconds (adjusted to be nonzero).
> > > *
> > > * This function may be called either with or without dev->power.lock held.
> > > * Either way it can be racy, since power.last_busy may be updated at any time.
> > > @@ -129,24 +129,21 @@ static void pm_runtime_cancel_pending(struct device *dev)
> > > u64 pm_runtime_autosuspend_expiration(struct device *dev)
> > > {
> > > int autosuspend_delay;
> > > - u64 last_busy, expires = 0;
> > > - u64 now = ktime_to_ns(ktime_get());
> > > + u64 expires;
> > >
> > > if (!dev->power.use_autosuspend)
> > > - goto out;
> > > + return 0;
> > >
> > > autosuspend_delay = READ_ONCE(dev->power.autosuspend_delay);
> > > if (autosuspend_delay < 0)
> > > - goto out;
> > > -
> > > - last_busy = READ_ONCE(dev->power.last_busy);
> > > + return 0;
> > >
> > > - expires = last_busy + autosuspend_delay * NSEC_PER_MSEC;
> > > - if (expires <= now)
> > > - expires = 0; /* Already expired. */
> > > + expires = READ_ONCE(dev->power.last_busy);
> > > + expires += NSEC_PER_MSEC * (u64)autosuspend_delay;
> > > + if (expires > ktime_to_ns(ktime_get()))
> > > + return expires; /* Expires in the future */
> > >
> > > - out:
> > > - return expires;
> > > + return 0;
> > > }
> > > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pm_runtime_autosuspend_expiration);
> > >
> > > Which gives for arm:
> > > 00000480 <pm_runtime_autosuspend_expiration>:
> > > 480: e92d41f0 push {r4, r5, r6, r7, r8, lr}
> > > 484: e5d030d1 ldrb r3, [r0, #209] ; 0xd1
> > > 488: e3130004 tst r3, #4
> > > 48c: 0a00000c beq 4c4 <pm_runtime_autosuspend_expiration+0x44>
> > > 490: e59030e4 ldr r3, [r0, #228] ; 0xe4
> > > 494: e3530000 cmp r3, #0
> > > 498: ba000009 blt 4c4 <pm_runtime_autosuspend_expiration+0x44>
> > > 49c: e28050e8 add r5, r0, #232 ; 0xe8
> > > 4a0: e8950030 ldm r5, {r4, r5}
> > > 4a4: e59f2030 ldr r2, [pc, #48] ; 4dc <pm_runtime_autosuspend_expiration+0x5c>
> > > 4a8: e0e54392 smlal r4, r5, r2, r3
> > > 4ac: ebfffffe bl 0 <ktime_get>
> > > 4b0: e1550001 cmp r5, r1
> > > 4b4: 01540000 cmpeq r4, r0
> > > 4b8: e1a06004 mov r6, r4
> > > 4bc: e1a07005 mov r7, r5
> > > 4c0: 8a000001 bhi 4cc <pm_runtime_autosuspend_expiration+0x4c>
> > > 4c4: e3a06000 mov r6, #0
> > > 4c8: e3a07000 mov r7, #0
> > > 4cc: e1a00006 mov r0, r6
> > > 4d0: e1a01007 mov r1, r7
> > > 4d4: e8bd41f0 pop {r4, r5, r6, r7, r8, lr}
> > > 4d8: e12fff1e bx lr
> > > 4dc: 000f4240 .word 0x000f4240
> > >
> > > And x86:
> > > 0000000000000230 <pm_runtime_autosuspend_expiration.part.0>:
> > > 230: 8b 87 a4 01 00 00 mov 0x1a4(%rdi),%eax
> > > 236: 53 push %rbx
> > > 237: 85 c0 test %eax,%eax
> > > 239: 78 1e js 259 <pm_runtime_autosuspend_expiration.part.0+0x29>
> > > 23b: 48 63 d8 movslq %eax,%rbx
> > > 23e: 48 8b 97 a8 01 00 00 mov 0x1a8(%rdi),%rdx
> > > 245: 48 69 db 40 42 0f 00 imul $0xf4240,%rbx,%rbx
> > > 24c: 48 01 d3 add %rdx,%rbx
> > > 24f: e8 00 00 00 00 callq 254 <pm_runtime_autosuspend_expiration.part.0+0x24>
> > > 254: 48 39 c3 cmp %rax,%rbx
> > > 257: 77 02 ja 25b <pm_runtime_autosuspend_expiration.part.0+0x2b>
> > > 259: 31 db xor %ebx,%ebx
> > > 25b: 48 89 d8 mov %rbx,%rax
> > > 25e: 5b pop %rbx
> > > 25f: c3 retq
> > >
> > > 00000000000002a0 <pm_runtime_autosuspend_expiration>:
> > > 2a0: f6 87 91 01 00 00 04 testb $0x4,0x191(%rdi)
> > > 2a7: 74 02 je 2ab <pm_runtime_autosuspend_expiration+0xb>
> > > 2a9: eb 85 jmp 230 <pm_runtime_autosuspend_expiration.part.0>
> > > 2ab: 31 c0 xor %eax,%eax
> > > 2ad: c3 retq
> > > 2ae: 66 90 xchg %ax,%ax
> > >
> > >
> > > [snip]
> > > > > Well, main concern was not to call ktime_get at the beginning of function
> > > > > as it is not too cheap.
> > > >
> > > > Doesn't the compiler optimize that to just before the test ?
> > >
> > > No (compare with above). And it is also almost certain that someone will run
> > > script and send "...do not needlesly initialize..." patch :)
> > >
> > > gcc version 8.2.1 20181130 (OSELAS.Toolchain-2018.12.0 8-20181130)
> > >
> > > 00000110 <pm_runtime_autosuspend_expiration>:
> > > 110: e92d41f0 push {r4, r5, r6, r7, r8, lr}
> > > 114: e1a06000 mov r6, r0
> > > 118: ebfffffe bl 0 <ktime_get>
> > > 11c: e5d630d1 ldrb r3, [r6, #209] ; 0xd1
> > > 120: e3130004 tst r3, #4
> > > 124: 0a00000d beq 160 <pm_runtime_autosuspend_expiration+0x50>
> > > 128: e596c0e4 ldr ip, [r6, #228] ; 0xe4
> > > 12c: e35c0000 cmp ip, #0
> > > 130: ba00000a blt 160 <pm_runtime_autosuspend_expiration+0x50>
> > > 134: e28630e8 add r3, r6, #232 ; 0xe8
> > > 138: e893000c ldm r3, {r2, r3}
> > > 13c: e1a05001 mov r5, r1
> > > 140: e1a04000 mov r4, r0
> > > 144: e59f002c ldr r0, [pc, #44] ; 178 <pm_runtime_autosuspend_expiration+0x68>
> > > 148: e0010c90 mul r1, r0, ip
> > > 14c: e0926001 adds r6, r2, r1
> > > 150: e0a37fc1 adc r7, r3, r1, asr #31
> > > 154: e1550007 cmp r5, r7
> > > 158: 01540006 cmpeq r4, r6
> > > 15c: 3a000001 bcc 168 <pm_runtime_autosuspend_expiration+0x58>
> > > 160: e3a06000 mov r6, #0
> > > 164: e3a07000 mov r7, #0
> > > 168: e1a00006 mov r0, r6
> > > 16c: e1a01007 mov r1, r7
> > > 170: e8bd41f0 pop {r4, r5, r6, r7, r8, lr}
> > > 174: e12fff1e bx lr
> > > 178: 000f4240 .word 0x000f4240
Powered by blists - more mailing lists