linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] seccomp: build fix for v5.0-rc2

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190110031839.GD28330@cisco>
Date:   Wed, 9 Jan 2019 20:18:39 -0700
From:   Tycho Andersen <tycho@...ho.ws>
To:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc:     Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        linux-security-module <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] seccomp: build fix for v5.0-rc2

On Wed, Jan 09, 2019 at 07:59:16AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> * Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> wrote:
> 
> > This was already picked up by x86-urgent...
> > 
> > -Kees
> 
> I'm fine with both routes - if Linus pulls this I'll zap the x86/urgent 
> one.

The patches are different actually. I've confirmed the one in
x86/urgent is correct, and this one is from the initial thread where I
was just guessing. The difference is HOSTCFLAGS vs. HOSTLDFLAGS for .o
files. So I think we should drop this and just keep the one in
x86/urgent.

Thanks,

Tycho