linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v15 3/6] x86/boot: Introduce efi_get_rsdp

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190110211523.GG17621@zn.tnic>
Date:   Thu, 10 Jan 2019 22:15:23 +0100
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To:     Chao Fan <fanc.fnst@...fujitsu.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
        mingo@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com, keescook@...omium.org,
        bhe@...hat.com, msys.mizuma@...il.com, indou.takao@...fujitsu.com,
        caoj.fnst@...fujitsu.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v15 3/6] x86/boot: Introduce efi_get_rsdp_addr() to find
 RSDP from EFI table

On Mon, Jan 07, 2019 at 11:22:40AM +0800, Chao Fan wrote:
> Memory information in SRAT is necessary to fix the conflict between
> KASLR and memory-hotremove. So RSDP and SRAT should be parsed.
> 
> When booting form KEXEC/EFI/BIOS, the methods to compute RSDP
> are different. When booting from EFI, EFI table points to RSDP.
> So parse the EFI table and find the RSDP.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chao Fan <fanc.fnst@...fujitsu.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/boot/compressed/acpi.c | 83 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 83 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/acpi.c b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/acpi.c
> index 7ca5001d7639..f74c5d033d79 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/acpi.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/acpi.c
> @@ -5,6 +5,8 @@
>  #include "../string.h"
>  
>  #include <linux/acpi.h>
> +#include <linux/efi.h>
> +#include <asm/efi.h>
>  
>  /*
>   * Max length of 64-bit hex address string is 19, prefix "0x" + 16 hex
> @@ -28,3 +30,84 @@ static acpi_physical_address get_acpi_rsdp(void)
>  #endif
>  	return 0;
>  }
> +
> +/* Search EFI table for RSDP. */
> +static acpi_physical_address efi_get_rsdp_addr(void)
> +{
> +	acpi_physical_address rsdp_addr = 0;


<---- newline here.

> +#ifdef CONFIG_EFI
> +	efi_system_table_t *systab;
> +	struct efi_info *ei;
> +	bool efi_64;
> +	char *sig;
> +	int size;
> +	int i;
> +
> +	ei = &boot_params->efi_info;
> +	sig = (char *)&ei->efi_loader_signature;
> +
> +	if (!strncmp(sig, EFI64_LOADER_SIGNATURE, 4)) {
> +		efi_64 = true;
> +	} else if (!strncmp(sig, EFI32_LOADER_SIGNATURE, 4)) {
> +		efi_64 = false;
> +	} else {
> +		debug_putstr("Wrong EFI loader signature.\n");
> +		return 0;
> +	}
> +
> +	/* Get systab from boot params. Based on efi_init(). */
> +#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
> +	systab = (efi_system_table_t *)(ei->efi_systab | ((__u64)ei->efi_systab_hi<<32));
> +#else
> +	if (ei->efi_systab_hi || ei->efi_memmap_hi) {
> +		debug_putstr("Error getting RSDP address: EFI system table located above 4GB.\n");
> +		return 0;
> +	}
> +	systab = (efi_system_table_t *)ei->efi_systab;
> +#endif
> +
> +	if (!systab)
> +		error("EFI system table is not found.");

s/is//

> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Get EFI tables from systab. Based on efi_config_init() and
> +	 * efi_config_parse_tables().
> +	 */
> +	size = efi_64 ? sizeof(efi_config_table_64_t) :
> +			sizeof(efi_config_table_32_t);
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < systab->nr_tables; i++) {
> +		void *config_tables;
> +		unsigned long table;
> +		efi_guid_t guid;
> +
> +		config_tables = (void *)(systab->tables + size * i);
> +		if (efi_64) {
> +			efi_config_table_64_t *tmp_table;
> +			u64 table64;
> +
> +			tmp_table = config_tables;
> +			guid = tmp_table->guid;
> +			table64 = tmp_table->table;
> +			table = table64;

That table64 looks superfluous.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.